Hopkins vs. Tarver Disscussion Thread...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ReadyUp
    Pound 4 Pound
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2005
    • 3860
    • 224
    • 738
    • 10,840

    #11
    Alright, both of you guys are saying that Hopkins power is underrated and that Tarver was hurt from a PUNCH.

    You guys are nuts.

    Comment

    • ReadyUp
      Pound 4 Pound
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2005
      • 3860
      • 224
      • 738
      • 10,840

      #12
      Truth is if Bernard Hopkins had knockout power than he would have KO'd Jermain plain and simple.

      Bernard systematically dismantles opponents. He doesn't bomb them out with heavy punches. When he hits you, he throws his shoulder into you, ****s you with his hip, roughs you up royally.
      Don't get it twisted, he doesn't have big power at middleweight let alone light heavy.

      Comment

      • GunStar
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 10656
        • 774
        • 2,464
        • 12,344

        #13
        Originally posted by SquareCircle
        lederman too..
        Yea lederman, also Manny too. The HBO guys are fun, but I don't agree with them most of the time.

        Comment

        • GunStar
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 10656
          • 774
          • 2,464
          • 12,344

          #14
          Originally posted by Goldenboyprm
          Alright, both of you guys are saying that Hopkins power is underrated and that Tarver was hurt from a PUNCH.

          You guys are nuts.
          Lol, actually anyone that have seen the fight will surely agree that Tarver was hurt.

          Comment

          • ReadyUp
            Pound 4 Pound
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2005
            • 3860
            • 224
            • 738
            • 10,840

            #15
            Originally posted by Gunstar1
            Lol, actually anyone that have seen the fight will surely agree that Tarver was hurt.
            Your talking about the first fight. I've watched it many times.
            And I agree when I first saw it it looked like he stunned Tarver and I got excited because, as much as I like Tarver, Johnson is a good guy and hard to outright root against. When they showed the replay you'll see that the supposed "big punches" didn't even land flush. Tarver was never in serious danger of hitting the mat or getting knocked out. Thus, he wasn't "hurt".

            Comment

            • kg21mvp
              QC's Finest
              • Jan 2006
              • 0
              • 129
              • 151
              • 13,182

              #16
              tarver would win the fight..hopkin's style is not suitable with boxing nowadays, look at the fight against taylor..and tarver is more agresive..

              Comment

              • deuce_drop
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2004
                • 5434
                • 263
                • 320
                • 13,572

                #17
                Hopkins can win this fight easily if he leads and isn't afraid to pull the trigger.

                Tarver waits on his opponents and can led to follow along with what other fighters want him to do, Hokins used to reall y good at making guys do what he wants them to do. the only thing about that is that was when Hopkins wasn't afraid to let his hands go.

                Tarver can easily be out hustled, had RJJ had more of an punch output in their last fight, it might have been a closer fight. Tarver would wait on Roy and when Roy did do somethin he'd sometimes sit and take it without countering or anything.

                Tarver can't out box Hopkins(if Hopkins throws punches)and he isn't going to be able to hit Hopkins cleanly.

                i think however is more active in this fight will be the winner.

                i pulling for Hopkins in this fight......

                Comment

                • JackSlack
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Feb 2006
                  • 113
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  • 6,459

                  #18
                  Great Fight

                  This should be a good one between two tough guys that like the smack talk and can back it up.
                  Hopkins in a sure bet Hall of Famer, and Antonio likes to talk but can deliver the goods.
                  Bernard is a very big man for a middleweight, so the two are probably about the same size naturally.
                  This is about even as I see it.

                  Comment

                  • Truth
                    Old School Member
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2004
                    • 18228
                    • 578
                    • 409
                    • 30,780

                    #19
                    Would Bernard even be considered a light heavyweight champion if he beat Antonio Tarver? Tarver doesn't have any belts...besides some alphabet ones.

                    Comment

                    • deuce_drop
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 5434
                      • 263
                      • 320
                      • 13,572

                      #20
                      Originally posted by IRON TRUTH
                      Would Bernard even be considered a light heavyweight champion if he beat Antonio Tarver? Tarver doesn't have any belts...besides some alphabet ones.
                      yeah but Tarver is considered the man to beat in the Light Heavyweight division.......

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP