Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

[billeau2]

I try so hard not to respond the the obvious bait and converse with such a bummy poster as yourself, but I always seem to get ****** in...

Wladimir got hit by a good punch and got through it, and got through it EASILY. ALL of your old favourites have had their rhythm interrupted many many more times, but Wlad gets hit once and throws his hands up and BAM he's no good, he's weak?

LISTEN to yourself!

And excuses? Nobody is making an excuse he lost, suffice to say there are OBVIOUS implications about Wlad's performance in this fight.

You simply refuse to look at it unbiasedly.

As stated many numerous times, I follow the path of truth wherever it may go, completely free of bias. It's ONLY because of that that I can make such an egalitarian stance.

All your ritual abuse and word play does NOTHING to hide your bum ideas.

Everytime you post like this there is a rhetort setting you straight...And it is a welcome development. I don't look at myself as anything more than abiding to a standard set by the muhammed ali of philosphers looked at the task at hand.... I try to be a g***** and somewhat live up to that standard set a long time ago when people were, by all accounts, much as they are today. They think their opinions are facts. Sound familiar?

A g***** is a nuisance, it makes a horse realize its presence... When you post the inanities you post, its a crime to let you get away with it. You are disrespectful to men who have excelled in the Sweet Science, you are an insult to the intelligence of posters who by and large are knowledgable and open to learning about the sport, while being a fan of various fighters. You prevail almost exclusively because you are a volume poster. How you ever got any Green K is beyond me, but to each his/her own.

But you serve a useful purpose. You show what a dunce looks like...you used to be entertaining as well, until they let you back in the history section where you **** up threads constantly.

Punchers that Vlad has faced, note that none of these guys are considered a great fighter, or puncher:

brewster lost one won one when Brewster was past it

Sam Peter knocked down but won it

Corrie sanders lost it

David Haye Won it.

Not such a great record...and if we are really being fair? even worse!

[Elroy1]

Wlad lost the Brewster fight because he wasn't allowed control Brewster with illegal holding.

Wlad was utterly dominating Brewster. He "lost" that fight because, and ONLY because of a very serious medical condition he was suffering. This is beyond any debate, the Brewster loss was not kosher and really Wlad has to date only legitimately lost 3 times (Puritty, Sanders, Fury).

What year was that ? 2004? Go forward 11 years to the Jennings fight where he got a point deducted for illegal holding and you will find he has illegally held and fouled all the way through his 11 years as Champ.

He has dominantly dispatched all of his opponents with a near perfect display of boxing the world has never before seen.

Ali didn't lose to Foreman when his simple holds had no effect whatsoever on Big George. And make no mistake - a simple hold that is easily broken out of is all it was. There was no enormous size , height and strength advantage there for Ali to cover his entire opponents back like a blanket and push them into the canvas.

On his Foreman fight, there were more circumstantial aspects of Ali's victory in this fight than possibly any other fight in history, all of which benefitted Ali. When his holding failed, his next methods were TOTALLY moronic altogether!

As for the comparison with Wlad, Wlad clinches, Ali grabs his opponents head and pushes it down, Wlad's is legal, Ali's is illegal. In fact it is Ali who would be DQ'd today, not vice verse.. Obviously!

And Ali was more shot and battle worn in that Foreman fight than Wlad was against Fury.

The Wladimir that faced Fury was among the worst versions of Wlad there has been in the last 15 years.

The version of Ali that faced Foreman was the VERY very best version of Ali there ever was!

Only a nut bag extremist would point to a 60's Ali as being better- that guy never once faced even a decent opponent and would have been wasted by any decent HW.

This is why Wlad doesn't share 1% of Ali's greatness. Not 1%. And Povetkin would be lucky if he ever entered into the top 100 , somewhere around the 80-100 mark. Such is he the one note , ordinary opponent that Wlad could not out box to save his life.

Ali is not fit to carry either mans jock strap.

Kliitards better hope and pray he beats Wilder next , because if he doesn't , Wilder will obtain a better resume than both Povetkin and Vitalli.
Wilder also knocking out Povetkin will shatter Wlads record into dust.[/QUOTE]

None of which is especially likely or even true!

[Burt Saxby]

Wlad was utterly dominating Brewster. He "lost" that fight because, and ONLY because of a very serious medical condition he was suffering. This is beyond any debate, the Brewster loss was not kosher and really Wlad has to date only legitimately lost 3 times (Puritty, Sanders, Fury).

Only a moron troll would post something like that. Nobody and i mean nobody takes that nonsense seriously.
The fact is he won 3 round out of 5 , proving for a second time that when dragged into a fight , he hasn't the mental resolve nor rounded skill set to fight his way out of it. Nor the conditioning to be engaged in 3 mins of combat.
When put under these conditions , he couldn't go past 6 with the ordinary Brewtser.

He has dominantly dispatched all of his opponents with a near perfect display of boxing the world has never before seen.

Translation - Beat undersized , under skilled C- levelers in a laborious , robotic manner.

On his Foreman fight, there were more circumstantial aspects of Ali's victory in this fight than possibly any other fight in history, all of which benefitted Ali. When his holding failed, his next methods were TOTALLY moronic altogether!

He put it on the line to get the win. Something Wlad is incapable of doing.

As for the comparison with Wlad, Wlad clinches, Ali grabs his opponents head and pushes it down, Wlad's is legal, Ali's is illegal. In fact it is Ali who would be DQ'd today, not vice verse.. Obviously!

Ali clinched under desperate circumstances , against fearsome opponents and savage powered pressure fighters.
It was purely out of survival and he mostly fought his way out of the clinch.
Wlad initiates clinching as an offensive tool at mid range and at close range. He uses illegal holding to break down his opponent and to set the pace of the fight to his comfort.
He never had to fight out of the clinch with his back to the ropes like Ali in the Frazier rematch.
His employee (the ref) breaks immediately and separates both combatants , which is exactly where Wlad wants to be.
His entire reign has been a manufactured , fraudulent farce.

The Wladimir that faced Fury was among the worst versions of Wlad there has been in the last 15 years.

So why was he the massive favourite to destroy Fury?

The version of Ali that faced Foreman was the VERY very best version of Ali there ever was!

I know you are a ****** troll , but don't stop reminding the forum.
That Ali had suffered hellish wars , broken jaws and terrible beatings along with a long lay off. He wasn't the same fighter and everybody knew it. Unlike Wlad , Ali was the huge underdog. People were worried for his health.

Only a nut bag extremist would point to a 60's Ali as being better- that guy never once faced even a decent opponent and would have been wasted by any decent HW.

60's Ali alone has a record of 6-0-0 against top 50 HW greats. Wlad has a career record 0f 0-0-0 against top 50 HW Greats.

Ali is not fit to carry either mans jock strap.

You can hold onto that thought within your own little bubble that is isolated from the rest of the world.

[sunny31]

Wlad was utterly dominating Brewster. He "lost" that fight because, and ONLY because of a very serious medical condition he was suffering. This is beyond any debate, the Brewster loss was not kosher and really Wlad has to date only legitimately lost 3 times (Puritty, Sanders, Fury).



He has dominantly dispatched all of his opponents with a near perfect display of boxing the world has never before seen.



On his Foreman fight, there were more circumstantial aspects of Ali's victory in this fight than possibly any other fight in history, all of which benefitted Ali. When his holding failed, his next methods were TOTALLY moronic altogether!

As for the comparison with Wlad, Wlad clinches, Ali grabs his opponents head and pushes it down, Wlad's is legal, Ali's is illegal. In fact it is Ali who would be DQ'd today, not vice verse.. Obviously!



The Wladimir that faced Fury was among the worst versions of Wlad there has been in the last 15 years.

The version of Ali that faced Foreman was the VERY very best version of Ali there ever was!

Only a nut bag extremist would point to a 60's Ali as being better- that guy never once faced even a decent opponent and would have been wasted by any decent HW.



Ali is not fit to carry either mans jock strap.

Kliitards better hope and pray he beats Wilder next , because if he doesn't , Wilder will obtain a better resume than both Povetkin and Vitalli.
Wilder also knocking out Povetkin will shatter Wlads record into dust.

None of which is especially likely or even true![/QUOTE]

It must have taken you a long time to create another account under a false alias and get so much rep, but then again it probably came from only other Klits like you and from your other accounts, yes you are that pathetic. Klitschko fans lose at life.

[LoadedWraps]

Who remembers that poster Easy Work?

I wish that idiot was still around so i could laugh in his face.

Easy Work got wrecked. It was easy work. No pun intended.

If he had balls he would come back and eat that crow.

[Suckmedry]

Elroy has gone completely and utterly insane. Reading some of the garbage he writes, makes it hard to believe what I'm reading tbh. I actually just showed some of his rants in this thread to a boxing friend, and he didnt even laugh, just looked stunned and said this guy clearly needs to get outside and see the sunlight

[removed]

Easy Work got wrecked. It was easy work. No pun intended.

If he had balls he would come back and eat that crow.

Easy work didn't want this work.

[yoz]

Hey does anybody wanna hear a secret?

I actually won some money on Fury on Nov 28

I wouldn't be surprised. You always were a suspect Klitschko fan.

[Weltschmerz]

I wouldn't be surprised. You always were a suspect Klitschko fan.

I thought of it as win-win for me. I wanted Vladimir to win, but should Fury steal the show I would get a bit of monetary soothing in time of defeat. I just had this feeling Fury might do it.

[billeau2]

I thought of it as win-win for me. I wanted Vladimir to win, but should Fury steal the show I would get a bit of monetary soothing in time of defeat. I just had this feeling Fury might do it.

I will say for the record that I can believe this. Our points bet was tongue in cheek, more so than some of the more rancerous bets made here.