Originally posted by Elroy1
View Post
let me just rephrase a post that you mocked and clue you in on a few things and then no more responses. I said "one can forensickly deconstruct what a victory would conceviably look like for Fury and draw some useful conclusions, and to paraphrase it was determined that this strategy had worked well for the Holm fight. Specifically for this fight I determined that in fact, while many thought Vlad to be a better boxer, this was in fact questionable...Vlad really is a powerful puncher with a great jab...
Remember now? heres some more refreshment: shut down Vlad's jab and he has little skills besides a big punch at a stationary target and this would ensure a Fury victory.
Now troll this will be my one "told ya so" shut your pie hole, stop passing the nonsense you pass off as fact, stop using analogies you are unfamiliar with like physics which you know nothing about, and understand this...Whatever one thinks of Fury he is a bit like a fighter from a generation where a man was expected to learn all skill sets, move properly in the ring, and develop with mentorship under the supervision of those who knew the tricks of the trade...Fury is a work in progress, who is progressing well. he has been taught to move, fight inside and out, take advantage of an opponents weaknesses, by a fighting family.
Now hear this: in this flat footed stationary division, where you have the gal to claim these men are superior, Fury has the tremendous advantages described above. Vlad never showed he could fight a moving target, much less some of the fighters you degrade on a regular basis.
So eat crow! or better yet, stop polluting the boards with your BS for at least a while.

Comment