Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Burt Saxby View Post
    Sam Peter was feather fisted joke. He stopped none of his opponents that mattered. Even worse - he lost to all of them.
    Peter VS Natural Cruiser Chambers. Didn't come close to stopping him.
    Fury VS Cruiser Cunningham. Knocked spark out for the 10 count.

    Because Fury is a faster , sharper more accurate puncher who who can land shots guys don't see coming - that makes him a far better hitter than wild Peter who swung punches with poor technique a mile out of range. And that num Peter still had Wlad running in fear for the majority of the fight.
    Yeah you would try to spin that wouldn't you mate!!!

    Samuel Peter was a featherfist right and Tyson Fury a hitter!?

    Nobody in their right mind could swallow that bloody tripe!!

    Peter was a feared puncher in his day, Fury is definitely not!

    The only similarity between Cunningham and Chambers is that they were former sub-HW's, but Chambers was possibly the most defensive HW of all time, kind of like a Byrd 2.0, and also, just like Byrd and UNLIKE Cunningham had a solid chin! Chambers was also about the fastest or right amongst the fastest boxers ever to fight at HW.

    It is UNDERSTANDABLE how Chambers could run and flip around the ring all night avoiding the crushing Peter power, but it's questionable how a 260+lb 6'9" fighter who is meant to be so good as Fury took so long to KO a less mobile, completely featherfisted and chinny Cunningham.

    There is an obvious reason why you take such a position, and it's your war on all things Klitschko.

    You are a hardcore American nationalist and nostalgist.'

    And your agenda against the Klitschko brothers is perhaps the worst that any of the forums have ever seen!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ThatLeftaMarc View Post
      Jennings definitely hits harder than Fury. Povetkin hits harder than Fury. Wach hits harder than Fury, even if he lacks speed. Haye hits harder than Fury. Chagaev hits harder than Fury. Thompson hits harder than Fury.

      It's rather interesting that you have so many Wladimir fault videos, almost as if you're prepared for these moments lmao

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BrometheusBob View Post
        Made some corrections. I'm 50/50 on chin, I'll let Fury have it. Fury has more heart than Haye at least. Basically little else is really debatable.

        FOTY candidate is laughable.
        How can Wlad have better bodywork when he's literally never thrown a body shot and Fury does so every fight?

        Stamina and combination punching? Wlad doesn't throw combinations unless you think 1-2 is a combination and Fury's stamina stinks all over Wlad's. Very weird thing you've put there.

        Fury literally throws twice as many shots a round as Wlad.
        Last edited by LacedUp; 07-09-2015, 05:04 AM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
          Yeah you would try to spin that wouldn't you mate!!!

          Samuel Peter was a featherfist right and Tyson Fury a hitter!?

          Nobody in their right mind could swallow that bloody tripe!!

          Peter was a feared puncher in his day, Fury is definitely not!

          The only similarity between Cunningham and Chambers is that they were former sub-HW's, but Chambers was possibly the most defensive HW of all time, kind of like a Byrd 2.0, and also, just like Byrd and UNLIKE Cunningham had a solid chin! Chambers was also about the fastest or right amongst the fastest boxers ever to fight at HW.

          It is UNDERSTANDABLE how Chambers could run and flip around the ring all night avoiding the crushing Peter power, but it's questionable how a 260+lb 6'9" fighter who is meant to be so good as Fury took so long to KO a less mobile, completely featherfisted and chinny Cunningham.

          There is an obvious reason why you take such a position, and it's your war on all things Klitschko.

          You are a hardcore American nationalist and nostalgist.'

          And your agenda against the Klitschko brothers is perhaps the worst that any of the forums have ever seen!
          Chambers stood dead square in the centre of the ring vs Sam Peter and never even went down.
          A fat middle weight took Peters 24 rounds.

          Peter couldn't punch the cream of a cup cake.

          Comment


          • Fury is at an advantage inside and Wlad outside.

            Gun to head. Wlad. Probably by knockout.

            Strength is a big factor here. I have a feeling Wlad is stronger and will be able to stop Fury doing too much damage inside.

            Still the most interesting fight that can be made in the division Wlad vs a guy who will essentially be a 6'9, 18 stone, pressure fighter. It will be a blast.

            Most interesting heavyweight fight for absolutely ages.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
              How can Wlad have better bodywork when he's literally never thrown a body shot and Fury does so every fight?

              Stamina and combination punching? Wlad doesn't throw combinations unless you think 1-2 is a combination and Fury's stamina stinks all over Wlad's. Very weird thing you've put there.

              Fury literally throws twice as many shots a round as Wlad.
              Have you noticed that many of the Fury haters on here seem to know f*** all about boxing? The posters who think that Fury has a chance are coming here and giving logical and informative information about both fighters and hence giving their prediction of how the fight will go down.

              Meanwhile the majority of the haters seem to be like "ZOMG FURY IS A ****IN BUM, WLADS GONNA KO HIM IN 10 SECONDS FLAT LOLZ"

              Comment


              • Originally posted by denium View Post
                Have you noticed that many of the Fury haters on here seem to know f*** all about boxing? The posters who think that Fury has a chance are coming here and giving logical and informative information about both fighters and hence giving their prediction of how the fight will go down.

                Meanwhile the majority of the haters seem to be like "ZOMG FURY IS A ****IN BUM, WLADS GONNA KO HIM IN 10 SECONDS FLAT LOLZ"
                This is true. Thinking about it objectively there is no way you can write off Fury.

                I don't think a lot of them have seen him fight apart from gifs of him punching himself and getting knocked down by Steve Cunningham.

                It is hard to imagine that fight without Wlad being put in situations that are as dangerous as he has been in for years. We don't really know what is going to happen when they are up close till it happens and it will happen a lot in that fight until the point when/if Wlad sparks him out.

                Comment


                • I give Fury a good chance. Wlad is bound to look old eventually and with his usually massive reach and heigh advantage nullified, it could be against Fury. Massively interesting fight.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by TKO88 View Post
                    Wlad will KO Fury fairly quickly and it will be glorious.
                    Please explain how. I'd love to hear it.

                    Comment


                    • It must be one of the best fights at HW in ages because for the first time not only am I seeing the usual opponent (Fury) being written off, but also I see many are writing WLAD off for a change! LOL

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP