Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

[Jewish-Reptile]

Scott would easily beat both Vitali and Wladimir.

How do I put this into my sig as a quote ?

This has to be one of the funniest comments I have ever read.

[Calculating...]

How do I put this into my sig as a quote ?

This has to be one of the funniest comments I have ever read.

You already quoted it, copy the whole quote (from your message)

Go to your signature settings and paste it,

[Jewish-Reptile]

Ustinov and Dimitrenko? What is their best combined win? Michael Sprott probably. Absolutely laughable. Chisora has beaten Helenius, Scott, Johnson - even Pulev gave up the EBU belt to avoid Chisora. Also, add to that Chisora had been competitive with Klitschko & Haye and fought Fury twice. Proven on another level to Pulev.

Steve Cunningham is a 2 time world champion who should have had a W over Adamek when he was ranked in the top 10. Has since gone on a decent run at heavy with wins over Mansour and a debatable loss to Glazkov and draw to Tarver. Beat Marco Huck in the past too who arguably beat Povetkin.

It's very simple to understand for a person who knows boxing. Which you obviously don't you're just keen to build up Klitschko.

What is Wach's best win? Kevin McBride? Perez' is Mago. Neither of which can even remotely compare to a Helenius or Scott.

Wach has a more impressive victory over Hammer than Fury himself.

Magomed was stopping guys in the same manner of which Wilder and Joshua were to a certain extent, his victories were as impressive as Helenius' if not more impressive and certainly around the same calibre of opponent, Perez deaf with him handily and room to spare.

Cunningham are we discussing the 200lb version or the 205lb one in which Fury had to foul repeatedly and force stoppage from behind with an illegal punch ? Lol.

I understand ok, you're funny and cute also. I take your posts for what they are hilarious.

[Machinist_X]

this **** wagging on whos fought who is funny and boring, it doesnt mean ****, if a man is ready for a test hes ready, tyson is a threat, on boxing ability he can only really fine tune what he has, like wlad did after his loses, wlad is a guy whos nearly 40, fury turned 27 not long ago. just saying you cannot compare them on records.

for example, if hughie fury keeps winning and gains ranking, that will just gain haters on here, in 2-3 years (or maybe less) you probably have ******s on this forum saying "who has hughie fury fought" and the kid will be 23-24.

both tyson and hughie are extremely talented for their age, tyson is a threat for people in the division, its the same with hughie, what 30+ year old man wants to get beaten by a undefeated 21 year old and who wants to get beaten by a undefeated 27 year old 6,9 **** talking gyspy.

its a huge risk, unless people are getting forced to fight due to rankings and titles its hard to get people to fight them, they price themselves out or avoid on purpose, most fighters want padded records and development time, at tysons age hes had decent names, compared to lets say... wilder LOL!

the furys also cannot offer people ****** money period, no promoter will overpay someone, the names they have fought have been fairly decent considering. no HW in the world can match wlads record, so on that point its ridiculous talking about.

to be honest in my opinion, in this age of the HW division to beat everyone, you dont need a record or a rein as long as wlads, you just need to beat a few people, povetkin, wilder, wlad, fury and maybe AJ as well when he has a bit longer, then you are the best because truthfully who else is legit? fury has also admitted he wont be in the game for a long time and is pushing for big fights, so hopefully i hope to see fights between these guys. wilder also isnt staying around for long.

[LacedUp]

Wach has a more impressive victory over Hammer than Fury himself.

Magomed was stopping guys in the same manner of which Wilder and Joshua were to a certain extent, his victories were as impressive as Helenius' if not more impressive and certainly around the same calibre of opponent, Perez deaf with him handily and room to spare.

Cunningham are we discussing the 200lb version or the 205lb one in which Fury had to foul repeatedly and force stoppage from behind with an illegal punch ? Lol.

I understand ok, you're funny and cute also. I take your posts for what they are hilarious.

Yeah and nobody is mentioning Hammer anywhere with Fury. It was a gimme fight. But probably Wach's best win

I won't talk bad about Mago, but who did he fight? No one.

We are discussing Steve Cunningham in general. When we're discussing Haye for Wladimir, we're not considering him a 5 fight novice are we?

Right. Dude, you've been pwned, owned and ***ed in the arse repeatedly in this thread.

I know you wish you were Hayden panettiere.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Yeah and nobody is mentioning Hammer anywhere with Fury. It was a gimme fight. But probably Wach's best win

I won't talk bad about Mago, but who did he fight? No one.

We are discussing Steve Cunningham in general. When we're discussing Haye for Wladimir, we're not considering him a 5 fight novice are we?

Right. Dude, you've been pwned, owned and ***ed in the arse repeatedly in this thread.

I know you wish you were Hayden panettiere.

When comparing Hammer and Chisora I really do not see too many differences, both are shyt, yet have maybe one or two half decent wins each .Wach went toe to toe with one and destroyed him, Fury facing both of them elected to fight exclusively behind his jab all night settling for tko's impressive in their own right but we're talking about an exciting heavyweight here aren't we in Fury ? Alright I understand he and his team have major reservations over his durability and chin, but lets not pretend he is something he clearly is not.

Fury has not the power to stop the champ, and he hasn't the skill to match him let alone defeat him on points.

The win over Magomed minus all the tragedy afterwards is as good a win for Perez than the Fury one over Chisora IMO, Mago was defeating the level of opposition guys Chisora feasted on his best run of his career more impressively and certainly more emphatically, without the controversy either !

When Cunningham is considered your best win you're really scraping the barrel. that's just my opinion so what's it matter huh, I'm just a Hayden Panettiere wannabe.

[removed]

Wach has a more impressive victory over Hammer than Fury himself.

Hammer was winning the fight until Wach caught him. Wach got a brutal KO, but it wasn't a great performance.

[LacedUp]

When comparing Hammer and Chisora I really do not see too many differences, both are shyt, yet have maybe one or two half decent wins each .Wach went toe to toe with one and destroyed him, Fury facing both of them elected to fight exclusively behind his jab all night settling for tko's impressive in their own right but we're talking about an exciting heavyweight here aren't we in Fury ? Alright I understand he and his team have major reservations over his durability and chin, but lets not pretend he is something he clearly is not.

Fury has not the power to stop the champ, and he hasn't the skill to match him let alone defeat him on points.

The win over Magomed minus all the tragedy afterwards is as good a win for Perez than the Fury one over Chisora IMO, Mago was defeating the level of opposition guys Chisora feasted on his best run of his career more impressively and certainly more emphatically, without the controversy either !

When Cunningham is considered your best win you're really scraping the barrel. that's just my opinion so what's it matter huh, I'm just a Hayden Panettiere wannabe.

Yes you are. :bukkake:

[mjbjst]

Wlad is gonna be out classed

[Calculating...]

Wlad is gonna be out classed

We can only cross our fingers and hope