I dont see what Canelo brings that can beat Miguel Cotto

[bigsmoothh]

Canelo started his pro career at age 15 while Cotto started his at 21. Canelo's first real test came 8 years from his pro debut with Trout. In 8 years from the start of Cotto's career he had fought undefeated's Torres, Malinaggi, and Quintana. He beat Judah and Shane while also winning tittles in multiple divisions. When Cotto was 23 he had only 18 pro fights while at 23 Canelo has had more then 40.. Of course Cotto wouldn't be much at age 23 with that experience. Lets see Canelo fight those guys with only 18 fights under his belt and see how he does. You are welcome.....

you forgot to mention that cotto had a amateur record while canelo didnt. canelo started at age 15 with zero experience. Canelo had to learn and yes even at 18 canelo would of done better than cotto. so like you posted up some names i will too canelo fought cintron, baldomir, ndou, mosley, lopez, trout. what up then? you welcome AGAIN......

[bigsmoothh]

buddy ginger ain't $h1t, he is hyped job created to make money, the mexican great white hope, duane bobick...

you are a prime example as why canelo keeps getting more famous. meanwhile you and your track team stay where yall belong.

[Beater_of_ass]

Sure, you could say that. It just wouldn't be an accurate statement. The correct analysis would be that it is very difficult for any fighter to hit Mayweather and Lara often (and Trout to a lesser extent). If you want to compare accuracy, take a look at Cotto's stats versus similar opposition. Canelo landed at a better percentage against Mayweather and Trout than Cotto did. People are too focused on size. The thing that changed Canelo's accuracy was the movement, skill and style of the fighters he faced. Angulo was the largest fighter he has ever faced and he was completely destroyed.

There's nothing to be ashamed of in having close fights with Trout and Lara.

You don't need punch stats to see who did better against Mayweather. Landing slightly more on Trout isn't really a big deal, it was a bad night for Cotto. The problem is Canelo has had 3 of his last 4 fights be "bad nights" but for some reason it's okay for him to struggle but if anyone else does they are no good, shot or a bum.

[GhostBlade]

Canelo brings youth, grit, power and a good chin. I think it may be a competitive fight the first five or so rounds but after that the youth in Canelo will take over and break down Cotto.

[bigsmoothh]

Wow this idiot actually called Gingy an ATG.

i know it hurts inside you. just admit it you love canelo ,bro.

[BucaRican]

cotto would throw and land his bread and butter left hook and it would be lights out.

Left hook all day on cinnamon sticks

[BucaRican]

Canelo brings youth, grit, power and a good chin. I think it may be a competitive fight the first five or so rounds but after that the youth in Canelo will take over and break down Cotto.

Good chin not so much when he got level and tagged by Jose Cotto.

[Public_Enemy]

You don't need punch stats to see who did better against Mayweather. Landing slightly more on Trout isn't really a big deal, it was a bad night for Cotto. The problem is Canelo has had 3 of his last 4 fights be "bad nights" but for some reason it's okay for him to struggle but if anyone else does they are no good, shot or a bum.

It's not looking bad when you have a tough, close fight with a good fighter. Mayweather made Canelo look bad. The other guys had tough fights with Canelo. Anytime you fight the type of fighters Canelo has faced, you'll have tough moments. It definitely won't be easy. Cotto is a perfect example of this. He fought Trout and Mayweather back to back just like Canelo did and we all saw the result. Even at his best, Cotto had tough fights with Clottey and Mosley. That didn't make him a bum or hype job. People have to understand you're not going to blow out all your opposition when you step up in class.

It's like me saying Cotto fought Mosley, Gomez, Margarito, Jennings, Clottey and Pacquiao. He had tough fights with 4 of 6. He's a bum/hypejob. Doesn't that sound ridiculous.

[bigsmoothh]

Good chin not so much when he got level and tagged by Jose Cotto.

can you post that clip when cotto gets tagged by corley i think and starts dubsteppin? please post it up.

[Doctor_Tenma]

You don't need punch stats to see who did better against Mayweather. Landing slightly more on Trout isn't really a big deal, it was a bad night for Cotto. The problem is Canelo has had 3 of his last 4 fights be "bad nights" but for some reason it's okay for him to struggle but if anyone else does they are no good, shot or a bum.

Has a lot to do with the fact that most picked Trout to beat Canelo, many picked Lara to not only win but do it impressively, some even by schooling. So the only thing one is forced to do is commend Canelo in coming out victorious. That's the only logical thing to do but many would rather not go that route.