Dan Rafael just said that Canelo won a deserved decision

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IronDanHamza
    BoxingScene Icon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 49518
    • 5,034
    • 270
    • 104,043

    #31
    I had Canelo edging it.

    But yet again, another obvious close fight being called a robbery.

    Comment

    • ShoulderRoll
      Join The Great Resist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 56342
      • 10,189
      • 5,035
      • 763,445

      #32
      115-113 either way would be acceptable and not a robbery. It was just that one judge's card that was too wide.
      Last edited by ShoulderRoll; 07-14-2014, 01:21 AM.

      Comment

      • QballLobo
        Undisputed Champion
        • Nov 2011
        • 7156
        • 1,310
        • 112
        • 48,002

        #33
        Some of you on here need to learn when the term robbery should be used.
        Rios/Abril was a robbery. The first Pac/Bradley fight was a robbery. Herrera/Garcia was a robbery.
        A close fight is not a robbery no matter which way it goes. Lara knew what he had to do to win, he just wasn't willing to do it. Did him and his team really think going into the fight that strategy would be a way to victory? If they did then Lara needs to fire all of them because he will never be in this position (headliner on a PPV card) again.

        Comment

        • Chrismart
          OK Jim...
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 14288
          • 837
          • 1,762
          • 308,493

          #34
          I don't normally mind Dan. But he has a problem with Lara and Rigo for sure.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP