Why does it seem to be Pac fans complaining most?

[The Big Dunn]

Um excuse me? Are you still mad that I busted your alt?

In your Floydiot opinion Maidana won 8-4 right and he also cheated? What did Canelo do to beat Lara? 7-5 Lara.

I have no problem with 7-5 lara- see my post in master thread after fight.

What I posted is what you posted when I asked you when did you suddenly have floyd winning 8-4 when the rematch was signed.

The other stuff is a nice try at deflection but will not work. It's no way to tell if your score is real or just BS because you want a reaction.

If a floyd lara fight is signed, you will change and say Canelo won. If a floyd Canelo rematch is signed, you will change and have lara winning 9-3 or something like that.

[The Big Dunn]

How did you score Castillo mayweather I

Why would anyone care about a score from 2001 and even if they did, what relevance does it have in scoring a fight in 2014?

[IMDAZED]

Some Mayweather fans think Canelo won this but mayweather beat Castillo first fight??
Who cares

I don't think there's a correlation throughout the fanbase but expect some Floyd fans to hype Canelo but say Floyd beat Castillo lol

What does one thing have to do with another?

[jas]

People are saying Canelo won because of body punching

Same with Castillo vs mayweather

I scored that fight 114-112 mayweather

[IronDanHamza]

What does one thing have to do with another?

Mind boggling stuff!!

They're two different fights Completely different styles all way round.

The amount of times I see "You scored this fight for them but this fight for them" yeah, because believe it not they're two different fights they aren't the same.

[IronDanHamza]

People are saying Canelo won because of body punching

Same with Castillo vs mayweather

I scored that fight 114-112 mayweather

So what, all displays of body punching are the same?

They-are-two-entirely-different-fights.

Literally entirely different.

[BattleAxePurist]

So what, all displays of body punching are the same?

They-are-two-entirely-different-fights.

Literally entirely different.

It's not about content.

It's about intent.

That's much easier for nsbers to grasp.

[Deeznuts]

What the hell is with that? The guys complaining most all seem to be the rabid Pac fans. How is this possible? What relationship is there? Both southpaws? Because their fighting styles, which you guys always talk about, are the absolute opposite.

Considering that they've always been about aggression and pushing the fight, why does it seem to be the rabid Pac fans complaining about robbery? How can you hypocritical pricks talk on one hand about Floyd, Rigo etc supposedly fighting like a *****, then on the other hand say this was a robbery, when it was only Canelo pushing the fight? This was worse than both Floyd and Rigo.

You guys argue that Pac should have won the Marquez fights because he pushed it and went for the KO more, but now you're all saying Lara boxed well, had better defense making Canelo miss more and got robbed...

You guys are ****ed. You talk about great defense winning the fight, without any offense though, then you'll go complain like little girls about Floyd winning a fight with better defense, and offense. Have some principle.

If you go for the 'aggression wins fights' you have to think Canelo won this fight, because he landed the harder shots, pushed it, and actually tried to go for the KO.

You all suck ass. Bunch of hypocritical pansies.

Either way, enough with the robbery talk! There was no robbery. Pro boxing is about who controlled the fight fight, had the more effective aggression and who landed the harder punches. Canelo was a deserving winner.

Its a conspiracy now what? You had to write an essay? Feeling lonely? No one to talk too?

[DeadLikeMe]

Lara embodies everything they claim to despise about boxing. If he had been decisively winning round after round in a legitimate robbery like the Williams fight, that would be a different story. The Williams-Lara decision was a travesty, last night the right fighter won.

In more recent examples, Algieri was throwing everything he had at Profraudnikov. Rigo might use a lot of movement and go for a walk now and then, but he is ****ing you up the rest of the time. Lara was doing nothing but playing the spoiler last night, and Canelo still was winning rounds. Canelo worked the body, finally managed to slow Lara down, and started getting to a guy who wasn't just on his bike he was on a Kawasaki Katana.

Canelo has beaten Trout, Angulo, and now Lara and apparently it means he sucks. Angulo was an unstoppable beast prior to the Canelo fight since NSB loves to pretend plodding brawlers are the dominant style in the sport. Provodnikov beat Mike friggin Alvarado and it meant he was the true 140 lbs champ and would beat Floyd according to these same tards. Cotto beats flippin' Devlin Rodriguez and a Sergio Martinez whose corner was having to sew a few limbs back on him between rounds and now he's an unstoppable beast because of Roach.

They're derranged and they're obsessed. Everything must be dedicated to the glorification of Pacman or disparage Mayweather. Pactards gonna tard. They didn't get the nickname for their brilliant contributions to boxing sites.

[hectari]

Pac tards want to discredit Canelo so that by extension they can discredit Floyd. Because ultimately everything always comes back to Floyd for them.

They are a cancer on the sport.

Its funny a flowmo calling pactars a cancer to the sport, when you die hard flowmos are even worse.

What you just said is the same thing you say about Pacquiao, but you guys were supporting Canelo to big up Floyds win, just like you say Pac can't beat this version of Cotto at 154 after Floyd struggled with him, or Canelo has more boxing skill than Pacquiao.

Get off it, both of you fanboys are horrible and biased.