Good interview. Props to the S.I interviewer for asking real hardline questions. Not just some pre agreed upon softball questions like over at Floydhype. Props to Espinoza as well for not beating around the bush and giving straight answers.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sports Illustrated interview w/ Stephen Espinoza
Collapse
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostGood interview. The stuff about the Aug 9th card was BS. Yes, fights can be better than they are on paper. But fans gravitate toward a fight before it happens, not as it happens.
You can't market a fight as a possible "real life rocky" and expect boxing fans to watch it.
Headline cards with great fights and let me stumble into a real life rocky on the undercard.
Comment
-
Originally posted by !! Shawn View PostThey did that with Rios vs Alvarado, and that worked out pretty well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Postrios v alvarado was a fight between two guys that are at the same level. Danny v Salka is a modern day apollo v rocky-right down to the fact no one knew balboa and no one knows salka.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AddiX View PostI found this interview to be worthless. It's just Espinoza defending his company from fans who either don't believe him or aren't happy with him.
He definitely sounded like a lawyer, and its pretty clear that the Floyd situation has been a flop with how he was trying to spin it.
Comment
-
I found this interview to be worthless. It's just Espinoza defending his company from fans who either don't believe him or aren't happy with him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View PostHe means he is just going to make up and believe whatever he wants no matter what the reality is.
Comment
-
Comment