Good interview. Props to the S.I interviewer for asking real hardline questions. Not just some pre agreed upon softball questions like over at Floydhype. Props to Espinoza as well for not beating around the bush and giving straight answers.
Sports Illustrated interview w/ Stephen Espinoza
Collapse
-
They did that with Rios vs Alvarado, and that worked out pretty well.Good interview. The stuff about the Aug 9th card was BS. Yes, fights can be better than they are on paper. But fans gravitate toward a fight before it happens, not as it happens.
You can't market a fight as a possible "real life rocky" and expect boxing fans to watch it.
Headline cards with great fights and let me stumble into a real life rocky on the undercard.Comment
-
Comment
-
Danny's had some nice wins but he's not an elite fighter. He's a great 140lber. The minute he moves up is the minute he'd get exposed. And I'm a big Danny Garcia fan but it's the simple truth.Comment
-
It was worrying that he trash talked the super-six at the end. That was one of the greatest things to happen to the sport in recent times. Gave us great fights, brought great fighters to mainstream success as well.
He definitely sounded like a lawyer, and its pretty clear that the Floyd situation has been a flop with how he was trying to spin it.Comment
-
Seemed like a decent read, he answered questions to issues fans discuss on this forum all the time. What did you expect from the interview?I found this interview to be worthless. It's just Espinoza defending his company from fans who either don't believe him or aren't happy with him.Comment
-
The reality is the guys over at showtime are feeding us garbage at this present moment. So until the cards get better I won't be watching. I watch boxing for competitive fights not supposed "names" vs tuneups. Paul Williams just did and interview saying the state of boxing was depressing at this moment. I agree.Comment
-
Comment
Comment