Vasyl lomechenko vs terrence crawford

**Aztekkas** · 07-03-2014, 08:02 PM

I don't see it unless you are talking "PFP" terms. That's a tough one but I like Vasyl on this one. Too much movement and hand speed, if it takes a tiring Gamboa in order for TC to finally begin gaining ground and begin to take over the fight. So on even terms I don't think he would be able to adjust in time for a smooth operating boxer like Loma.

Loma by Split Decision since TC will attempt to adjust and at least one judge would give him the fight since he was able to switch stances properly.

On fictional PFP terms, an actual FW vs oversized 135 pounder? For most cases you can reference TC vs Y. Gamboa.

*Edit* Oh at FW? no way TC can make weight. At LW? Look at post above

**mathed** · 07-03-2014, 08:13 PM

Crawford because he knows how to adapt. If it doesn't work, he'll try something else, something Russell couldn't do. Also, Crawford isn't Russell's size, he's much, much larger.

**Beercules** · 07-03-2014, 08:15 PM

Put up a poll you ****** alt

**Pain~Lucy** · 07-03-2014, 08:39 PM

how about klitschko vs loma, gold vs gold, hyper-realistic matchup

**CatchAndShoot** · 07-03-2014, 08:42 PM

P4P, Loma is the better fighter, IMO.

H2H, TC would win, because of size.

**Godsfly** · 07-03-2014, 08:45 PM

Originally posted by Aztekkas

I don't see it unless you are talking "PFP" terms. That's a tough one since but I like Vasyl on this one. Too much movement and hand speed, if it takes a tiring Gamboa in order for TC to finally begin gaining ground and begin to take over the fight, on even terms I don't think he would be able to adjust in time for a smooth operating boxer like Loma.

Loma by Split Decision since TC will attempt to adjust and at least one judge would give him the fight since he was able to switch stances properly.

On fictional PFP terms, an actual FW vs oversized 135 pounder? For most cases you can reference TC vs Y. Gamboa.

*Edit* Oh at FW? no way TC can make weight. At LW? Look at post above

I'm more confused then ever reading this post. what are you trying to say.

**Godsfly** · 07-03-2014, 08:52 PM

Originally posted by CatchAndShoot

P4P, Loma is the better fighter, IMO.

H2H, TC would win, because of size.

you guys are butt hurt...how the hell is lomo p4p better then crawford? does he have a better resume? no. is he more battle tested? no. would you put lomo ahead of crawford on the p4p list? NO. has he shown more dimensions and adjustments as crawford? hell no.........

again. people are just running around butt hurt at this point and it's pretty ****ing hilarious.

**CatchAndShoot** · 07-03-2014, 08:59 PM

Originally posted by pigsfly

you guys are butt hurt...how the hell is lomo p4p better then crawford? does he have a better resume? no. is he more battle tested? no. would you put lomo ahead of crawford on the p4p list? NO. has he shown more dimensions and adjustments as crawford? hell no.........

again.people are just running around butt hurt at this point and it's hilarious.

Loma is technically better than TC. He's busier than TC. He's more slick than TC. He's a better body puncher than TC. He's faster than TC. He uses the ring better than TC.

We're not talking about resumes or P4P list. We're purely talking conjecture, and personal opinions.

**Aztekkas** · 07-03-2014, 09:04 PM

Originally posted by pigsfly

I'm more confused then ever reading this post. what are you trying to say.

LOL i confused myself. I misread the original post

What I mean is Loma>>> TC in a PFP setting. At FW the fight is impossible since TC is too big and at LW well, the fight would have a similar result to Gamboa vs TC. Sorry about that lol, I re read the original post after i had already posted and i went back to attempt to "fix it", then ended up confused myself

Vasyl lomechenko vs terrence crawford