Froch has a better resume than Kovalev but which would be the better win for Stevenson at 175?
It's obviously Kovalev because he has the better record at the weight while Froch has no wins there.
Maidana's Broner win would be the equivalent of Froch beating Cloud or someone medicore at LHW.
The post you responded to was within that context (my response to Larry).
Maidana's record at 147 just isn't great, no top 5 opponents beaten.
I don't buy that b/s either. I'm with Thurman on this, a bunch of 140lbers artificially inflating the division chasing Pacquiao and Mayweather doth not a strong division maketh.
If all the best 168lbers went to 175 it would look good too but a killer like Kovalev would send most of them south in weight again.
It's obviously Kovalev because he has the better record at the weight while Froch has no wins there.
Maidana's Broner win would be the equivalent of Froch beating Cloud or someone medicore at LHW.
But I'm not assessing him as a welterweight.
Maidana's record at 147 just isn't great, no top 5 opponents beaten.
I don't buy that b/s either. I'm with Thurman on this, a bunch of 140lbers artificially inflating the division chasing Pacquiao and Mayweather doth not a strong division maketh.
If all the best 168lbers went to 175 it would look good too but a killer like Kovalev would send most of them south in weight again.
Comment