Because he was looking sensational and beating everyone . There it is obviously must be PEDs.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is there a SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE that Pacquiao USED STEROIDS?
Collapse
-
-
The logic on this site cracks me up.
Asking for a drug test is evidently all of the evidence required for confirming a fighter is a duck. The exception to the rule is if Pacquiao is asking Marquez to take a drug test.
On the other hand, refusing to take a drug test is not evidence of a fighter being on drugs. Again, the exception to the rule is Marquez refusing to take additional drug tests; in that case, he is as a guilty as sin.
_______
Calling things down the middle and honestly, refusing to take additional drug tests is su****ious. There obviously isn't evidence against Pacquiao, but it is highly su****ious that he walked away from a 50:50 split ( in what would have been the biggest fight of his career) because he didn't want to take a drug test.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Tase View Post238 replies.
4,169 views.
still 0 evidence of ped use.
at this time your thread is like trying to resurrect the dead....
paulie or no paulie it is what it is....
Comment
-
Originally posted by rws25 View PostBecause hes 5'5 and went from 105 to 150 in 4 years without an ounce of fat.....
And he was a malnourished 16yr old you fooking ******, people get heavier as they get older, bones get denser, muscles stronger...
And that guy in your sig was ALSO 106lbs at the SAME age that Pac was...
And 105lbs to 150 in 4 years... are you ******ed....?
Comment
-
Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Postwell, i don't expect one to not go and handover to floyd any concrete evidence of pac juicing he/she may have....this info entails big $$$$....
at this time your thread is like trying to resurrect the dead....
paulie or no paulie it is what it is....
back in business...he he he
Comment
-
Originally posted by FeFist View PostThe logic on this site cracks me up.
Asking for a drug test is evidently all of the evidence required for confirming a fighter is a duck. The exception to the rule is if Pacquiao is asking Marquez to take a drug test.
On the other hand, refusing to take a drug test is not evidence of a fighter being on drugs. Again, the exception to the rule is Marquez refusing to take additional drug tests; in that case, he is as a guilty as sin.
_______
Calling things down the middle and honestly, refusing to take additional drug tests is su****ious. There obviously isn't evidence against Pacquiao, but it is highly su****ious that he walked away from a 50:50 split ( in what would have been the biggest fight of his career) because he didn't want to take a drug test.
What cracks me up is you saying "refusing to take additional drug tests is su****ious" when from DAY #1, Manny accepted taking additional testing yet you are still su****ious!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Booty Dew View PostHe's 5'6.5
And he was a malnourished 16yr old you fooking ******, people get heavier as they get older, bones get denser, muscles stronger...
And that guy in your sig was ALSO 106lbs at the SAME age that Pac was...
And 105lbs to 150 in 4 years... are you ******ed....?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SD180sx View PostIf I remember correctly, it was the cut-off date for the OST that killed the first negotiation. Not Pac refusing OST. So where do some of you guys get that Pac refused OST?
Pac was obviously gonna shoot up roids and become a monster inside 14 days after being randomly tested for months prior
Originally posted by Hougigo View PostBecause he has a big head doe....indisputable proofLast edited by Weebler I; 07-01-2014, 08:50 PM.
Comment
Comment