Paulie Malignaggi Goes On Twitter Rant About Pacquiao & PEDs

[12TRIBEsRiSe]

has paulie condemned hopkins for rejecting pascal's request for drug testing? and isn't it strange and amazing that a man at 50 years old can still beat down guys in their prime? yet paulie says nothing. even now hopkins doesn't do extra testing to prove he's clean.

and how come paulie is so vocal about drug testing and being clean yet he hasn't, to my knowledge, submitted himself to extra drug testing. isn't that unfair and strange?

so much for paulie being fair and condemning all sides.

and it's not just the steroid acne that makes marquez look su****ious but the fact that he brought in a steroid scientist into his camp. did paulie say anything about marquez looking su****ious for hiring a steroid scientist. pacquiao has no connection whatsoever to a steroid chemist and has shown no signs of steroid abuse.

pascal didnt ask him to take test in the negotiations he asked him in a press conference after the fight was signed, totally different story... also the topic is pac man why are you bringing up all these other boxers?

[Divine Hammer]

pascal didnt ask him to take test in the negotiations he asked him in a press conference after the fight was signed, totally different story... also the topic is pac man why are you bringing up all these other boxers?

i'm bringing up these other boxers that paulie hasn't condemned.

the poster i was replying to said this:

Paulie is correct again, that only a silly fan-boy would condemn on one side and defend on the other for the same claim of chemical enhancement abuse.

so if that's the case then why doesn't paulie condemn other su****ious fighters? yet it only seems like he is focusing on pac all the time. a great man with no evidence or connection to steroids.

doesn't seem like paulie is being fair himself.

and hopkins is 50 years old yet is still beating up on young guys in their prime? but paulie says nothing about it, yet he constantly points out how pac (in his prime) moving up and beating up bigger fighters as being very su****ious.

[12TRIBEsRiSe]

i'm bringing up these other boxers that paulie hasn't condemned.

the poster i was replying to said this:



so if that's the case then why doesn't paulie condemn other su****ious fighters? yet it only seems like he is focusing on pac all the time. a great man with no evidence or connection to steroids.

doesn't seem like paulie is being fair himself.

and hopkins is 50 years old yet is still beating up on young guys in their prime? but paulie says nothing about it, yet he constantly points out how pac (in his prime) moving up and beating up other fighters as being very su****ious.

i understand all of that with bhop. etc but hes speaking on pac man so lets just stay on the topic and not divert away from whats being said.... pac man tho hes ATgreat will always be looked at with suspense... its no way around it. if im albe to admitt when my fav boxer is full of sht others should do it with their own.... the fact the fight didnt happen behind test n cut off dates makes it fishy its just reality.

[Divine Hammer]

i understand all of that with bhop. etc but hes speaking on pac man so lets just stay on the topic and not divert away from whats being said.... pac man tho hes ATgreat will always be looked at with suspense... its no way around it. if im albe to admitt when my fav boxer is full of sht others should do it with their own.... the fact the fight didnt happen behind test n cut off dates makes it fishy its just reality.

again i was replying to another person who said that paulie isn't a fan boy because he condemns both sides. but the truth is he doesn't. he only focuses on pacquiao.

paulie even said that he won't give pacquiao credit for taking extra drug testing and beating bradley because he didn't "destroy" him. yet paulie made a prediction that if pac took extra drug testing against bradley (which he did) then pac get's KO'ed (which he didn't).

paulie is just a hater. this is the truth. and he needs jesus.

[12TRIBEsRiSe]

again i was replying to another person who said that paulie isn't a fan boy because he condemns both sides. but the truth is he doesn't. he only focuses on pacquiao.

paulie even said that he won't give pacquiao credit for taking extra drug testing and beating bradley because he didn't "destroy" him. yet paulie made a prediction that if pac took extra drug testing against bradley (which he did) then pac get's KO'ed (which he didn't).

paulie is just a hater. this is the truth. and he needs jesus.

lmaooooooooo well okay man!!!!!

[arraamis]

again i was replying to another person who said that paulie isn't a fan boy because he condemns both sides. but the truth is he doesn't. he only focuses on pacquiao.

.

If you're gonna quote someone's post, at the very least, you should make an attempt to get the meaning correct. No where in my statement, do I imply or state that Paulie isn't a fan-boy and that he condemns on both sides.

"And Paulie is correct again, that only a silly fan-boy would condemn on one side and defend on the other for the same claim of chemical enhancement abuse.

Either you're fair across the board or you're a biased silly fan-boy."

So, don't attribute my statements to some malformed facsimile that you came up with .......... smdh!

[shadow-boxer]

again i was replying to another person who said that paulie isn't a fan boy because he condemns both sides. but the truth is he doesn't. he only focuses on pacquiao.

paulie even said that he won't give pacquiao credit for taking extra drug testing and beating bradley because he didn't "destroy" him. yet paulie made a prediction that if pac took extra drug testing against bradley (which he did) then pac get's KO'ed (which he didn't).

paulie is just a hater. this is the truth. and he needs jesus.

Remove that "Divine" in your name because you are nothing but a lying idiot. Unless you are referring to an extra drug testing for urine cause he (Pac) declined to have blood testing even if Bradley volunteered to pay the testing fee. It was only Bradley who had the extra blood testing with two diff agencies.

[Divine Hammer]

If you're gonna quote someone's post, at the very least, you should make an attempt to get the meaning correct. No where in my statement, do I imply or state that Paulie isn't a fan-boy and that he condemns on both sides.

"And Paulie is correct again, that only a silly fan-boy would condemn on one side and defend on the other for the same claim of chemical enhancement abuse.

Either you're fair across the board or you're a biased silly fan-boy."

So, don't attribute my statements to some malformed facsimile that you came up with .......... smdh!

you are the only one who is getting the meaning wrong. you know what you meant but choose to lie.

stop supporting paulie because he's a hater. why can't you see this? why do you hate a great man like pacquiao so much and prop up a hater like paulie? it's disturbing.

and using words like facsimile makes you sound pretentious.

[W1LL]

Paulie Malignaggi is an articulate, level-headed student of the game. He is not a hater. Everything he says is true, he has a better vantage point than 99% of us so he should be commended for speaking out on issues like this.

[Bardock]

like someone said, paulie is just salty he was never good enough to get the floyd or pac fight so he chose a side and ran with it. Everyone knows paulie is a mad shiet talker too