Could THIS Be the Reason Why Shawn Porter Hasn't Signed the Contract to Fight Brook?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

The BBBoC has been doing random testing in the ABA (amateurs) and professionals for a long time. It clearly states that Amir Khan has been subject to random blood and urine tests since his first professional fight meaning at least 2005 - it is likely before then that random testing was implemented.

http://www.***boxing.com/news/max-bo...leave-no-doubt

change the stars to max

pigsfly has thoroughly embarrassed himself in this thread

[BattlingNelson]

I hope you are wrong Dirk. Boxing would take a slap in the face if it's because of random testing that this fight isn't signed.

[W1LL]

To be honest I think Kell Brook is just scared of losing that 0. Getting the excuses in early.

[Godsfly]

The BBBoC has been doing random testing in the ABA (amateurs) and professionals for a long time. It clearly states that Amir Khan has been subject to random blood and urine tests since his first professional fight meaning at least 2005 - it is likely before then that random testing was implemented.

http://www.***boxing.com/news/max-bo...leave-no-doubt

change the stars to max

ok let me just smash this down with facts real quick (because it's gotten out of hand in here since i left) first of all british boxers don't get tested year round (fact) & before 2012 the BBBofC didn't implement randomized blood test.........in 2012 thats when that came into play. so what ever you're listening to what khan is saying it's a flat out lie (flat out) unless he was doing blood by his own expense. or he's just mistaken & talking about a random urine test. also he was tested in the Olympics for blood & urine but thats only because thats basic protocol across the board in the Olympics.


the actual BBBofC general "Robert Smith" was quoted saying "Random blood testing came in this year. But don't forget this costs money as well. That's not a reason for not doing it, but there is a dividing line for any governing body"

this year as in 2012 when he was quoted saying that. thats smashed. thats done........i don't wanna hear anything else about the british board implementing randomized blood before the year 2012 because it's completely untrue.

& the reason why i said british boxers don't actually do full year round randomized testing is because that would be too expensive. so that means it's more of a dodgy spotty process (A show up & test you one time off season & never show up again for that entire year, kinda thing) & I'm dead serious. & the BBBofC themselves was quoted in saying "We have 850 boxers and over the last two or three years we've done almost 200 out-of-competition tests," why isn't that 200 850 test? if you have a total of 850 boxers & "british fighters across the board get tested year round?" (as diggler so proudly claims)

in fact if you're doing true year round testing it should be a hell of a lot more then even 850 (if you test each of that 850 at least 5 times off season of a year) that would be a hell of lot more then 850 let alone 200. this type of dodgyness will leave the door open for hundreds guys to not even get tested at all.

and thats what fighters like david price was complaining about

"I haven't been randomly tested since I turned pro," Price told BBC Sport.

"Not once in three-and-a-half years.

I have had urine tests before title fights. but I'd like to see more random blood testing."



so in all truth i just proved that british boxers don't get tested year round nore was random blood implemented before 2012. what else do you want? because I'll sit here & drown you guys with more then enough information.

scorce: google "David Price calls for stricter drugs testing in boxing"

[Accountoffline]

I agree with you,

posters are acting like Divas.

Nobody answered my question about victor conte.

did he get caught for supplying illegal PEDs ?

Yeah he did quite a while back get caught selling steroids.

I think he served time for it, not much but a little bit of time.

[Godsfly]

pigsfly has thoroughly embarrassed himself in this thread

see my last post......


you are gonna quickly realize that u can't **** with me. everything that i talk about i already have the facts in my pocket before i even start debating about it.


have fun................`

[Divine Hammer]

i don't know how i can be a fan of porter anymore. he blatantly is ducking brook and he is probably using steroids too.

and i think his whole good guy image is a fakery lie. he might go to church with the cameras around but i don't think he truly believes in the word of God.

[Godsfly]

[Ryn0]

ok let me just smash this down with facts real quick (because it's gotten out of hand in here since i left) first of all british boxers don't get tested year round (fact) & before 2012 the BBBofC didn't implement randomized blood test.........in 2012 thats when that came into play. so what ever you're listening to what khan is saying it's a flat out lie (flat out) unless he was doing blood by his own expense. or he's just mistaken & talking about a random urine test. also he was tested in the Olympics for blood & urine but thats only because thats basic protocol across the board in the Olympics.


the actual BBBofC general "Robert Smith" was quoted saying "Random blood testing came in this year. But don't forget this costs money as well. That's not a reason for not doing it, but there is a dividing line for any governing body"

this year as in 2012 when he was quoted saying that. thats smashed. thats done........i don't wanna hear anything else about the british board implementing randomized blood before the year 2012 because it's completely untrue.

& the reason why i said british boxers don't actually do full year round randomized testing is because that would be too expensive. so that means it's more of a dodgy spotty process (A show up & test you one time off season & never show up again for that entire year, kinda thing) & I'm dead serious. & the BBBofC themselves was quoted in saying "We have 850 boxers and over the last two or three years we've done almost 200 out-of-competition tests," why isn't that 200 850 test? if you have a total of 850 boxers & "british fighters across the board get tested year round?" (as diggler so proudly claims)

in fact if you're doing true year round testing it should be a hell of a lot more then even 850 (if you test each of that 850 at least 5 times off season of a year) that would be a hell of lot more then 850 let alone 200. this type of dodgyness will leave the door open for hundreds guys to not even get tested at all.

and thats what fighters like david price was complaining about

"I haven't been randomly tested since I turned pro," Price told BBC Sport.

"Not once in three-and-a-half years.

I have had urine tests before title fights. but I'd like to see more random blood testing."



so in all truth i just proved that british boxers don't get tested year round nore was random blood implemented before 2012. what else do you want? because I'll sit here & drown you guys with more then enough information.

scorce: google "David Price calls for stricter drugs testing in boxing"

I've seen the article, hence the 'random' part of the drug testing. Some guys won't be blood tested some guys will I assume. And you are completely wrong about the BBBoC introducing it this year, additionally it is not VADA that conducts the doping tests (they have done so for British fighters fight abroad but it is actually UKAD (UK anti doping association)

Quote from 2012 from Richard Schaefer
It's really a non-issue with Amir. The British Boxing Board of Control retains jurisdiction on every fight, irrespective of where it is when Amir Khan fights. So the British Boxing Board of Control has implimented for many years already random Olympic style drug testing said Schaefer.

http://******.craveonline.com/news/1...lems-latest-35

Quote from 2002
Jess Harding, Promoter for the Wembley show commented, The random tests conducted by the British Boxing Board of Control will only benefit the sport in the long term. No-one can condone sports cheats at any level.

http://www.secondsout.com/uk-boxing-...-by-negus-news

"In 2010 the BBBoC carried out 70 random drug tests" re-quote from The Sun newspaper

http://boxingnewsworld.blogspot.co.u...anite-sun.html

Enzo Macca failing his drug test in 2012 is quoted as saying "'I have been tested over 20 times in my career and have never failed any random or post fight doping test, but on this occasion, due to my naivety, I have tested positive for a banned substance."

Why would he mention random testing if he was not random tested?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/box...rugs-test.html

[Godsfly]

I've seen the article, hence the 'random' part of the drug testing. Some guys won't be blood tested some guys will I assume. And you are completely wrong about the BBBoC introducing it this year, additionally it is not VADA that conducts the doping tests (they have done so for British fighters fight abroad but it is actually UKAD (UK anti doping association)

Quote from 2012 from Richard Schaefer
It's really a non-issue with Amir. The British Boxing Board of Control retains jurisdiction on every fight, irrespective of where it is when Amir Khan fights. So the British Boxing Board of Control has implimented for many years already random Olympic style drug testing said Schaefer.

http://******.craveonline.com/news/1...lems-latest-35

Quote from 2002
Jess Harding, Promoter for the Wembley show commented, The random tests conducted by the British Boxing Board of Control will only benefit the sport in the long term. No-one can condone sports cheats at any level.

http://www.secondsout.com/uk-boxing-...-by-negus-news

"In 2010 the BBBoC carried out 70 random drug tests" re-quote from The Sun newspaper

http://boxingnewsworld.blogspot.co.u...anite-sun.html

Enzo Macca failing his drug test in 2012 is quoted as saying "'I have been tested over 20 times in my career and have never failed any random or post fight doping test, but on this occasion, due to my naivety, I have tested positive for a banned substance."

Why would he mention random testing if he was not random tested?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/box...rugs-test.html

yea because it's urine. not blood......blood was recently introduced in 2012 as the BBBofC themselves state. not only do they state that but they admit that the transition to implement blood has been expensive (thats why it's been so dodgy) you're quoting test that didn't involve blood. blood came into play in 2012 (thats what you seem to be missing) and they don't do year round testing on boxers. i gave you direct quotes (not from Schaefer or anyone else) but the BBBofC themselves stating this. the 850 to 200 ratio alone proves that it's no where close to "year round" testing..............