Sturm won't take this fight.. Stevens would stop him and make him look old.. It won't be porter-paulie brutal, but close to it
IBF mandates Sturm vs Stevens for mandatory position?
Collapse
-
-
Ithink it's just Solimon's style that made him look his age.... Solimon is crazy with his activity and movement... it's really... awkwardComment
-
I get all that, but still.. Sturm is old, he had a good win over barker, but I think he is done at the top level.. Stevens-while not great, is good enough, and fresher and should make sturm look old..Comment
-
Sturm didn't look that bad it was due to Solimon's constant movement he never lets you get set he's always bouncing around changing angles coming in holding going backwards. Sturm could never get his groove bcse of the tempo the Aussie sets.
Stevens fights more to his liking in terms of pace but I'd still say Stevens outpoints him maybe stops Sturmy.Comment
-
How did Sturm become the mandatory AGAIN?
Why don't the IBF just mandate Sturm vs. Bundrage at a catchweight for some random made up title at 157. These guys have to have dirt on the IBF to be getting title shot after title shot. They recycle worse than Arum.Comment
-
Why do you always put a question mark on your thread titles when you always have the answer in the OP.
Just giving you a hard time, brawski.Comment
-
Eh, sometimes it's because it's what somebody on twitter says.... so it's like a he says she says. Then it turns out being true later on.
Don't want to be like... OMG, this is for sure happening!
I get disappointed sometimes opening up threads and either seeing it being totally untrue or just a horrible misinterpretation
I feel ya brahLast edited by Hougigo; 06-22-2014, 10:25 PM.Comment
Comment