Official Froch vs Groves II Master Discussion Thread

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NEETzsche
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2011
    • 8389
    • 283
    • 176
    • 29,441

    #391
    Originally posted by yoz
    Put £10 on a draw at 40/1. Still, rooting for Froch by early/mid KO
    Originally posted by LacedUp
    40/1??

    I could only get 23/1.

    I put money on Groves at 13/1 to win between 4-6 and 2,5/1 on Froch to win by stoppage at any time.
    new customers at paddypower can get groves to win at 5/1, £10 max bet

    Comment

    • yoz
      Yoz
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2011
      • 8617
      • 439
      • 427
      • 16,868

      #392
      Originally posted by LacedUp
      40/1??

      I could only get 23/1.

      I put money on Groves at 13/1 to win between 4-6 and 2,5/1 on Froch to win by stoppage at any time.
      Yeah, it was earlier in the week. Odds seem to have narrowed a bit now.

      Good call on your bets. If Groves wins by stoppage, it's early.

      Comment

      • Resilient
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2014
        • 2888
        • 175
        • 123
        • 3,263

        #393
        Originally posted by `STEELHEAD
        this is the facts:
        Groves has no chance, Froch has him beat in almost every aspect.
        lololol

        ''The truth is the truth and the truth hurts'' - Angel Garcia

        -Groves has faster hands
        -Groves hits harder (debatable but he at least matches him)
        -Groves has better footwork and balance
        -Groves has faster feet
        -Groves moves better
        -Groves has a better defence
        -Groves has better punch technique
        -Groves has better timing
        -Groves has a better jab
        -Froch has a better chin
        -Froch has better stamina

        Comment

        • MisterDeclanCor
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Aug 2013
          • 384
          • 23
          • 33
          • 6,691

          #394
          Originally posted by Dr Rumack
          Everyone's so enthralled with the 'psychological warfare' that the boxing part seems to have been largely forgotten about in the media.

          I watched the first fight back today and I have my doubts about Groves' chances if it goes the distance. He has so many problems in this match-up. He doesn't control the distance well enough, he's hittable from the outside even for Froch, and his inside game is really weak, especially in defensive terms.

          If he can put Froch away with an early onslaught then that will be a huge achievement. But if he can't I don't know that he can hang with Froch going down the stretch. He doesn't slip shots particularly well, he doesn't smother Froch's offence well enough, and he's doesn't turn Carl often enough when Carl comes charging in.

          If he can't change something there then he's looking at a war of attrition with one of the most resilient fighters in the sport. And that's not good.
          GOOD ANALYSIS. I'd side with this. Still rooting for Groves tho!

          Comment

          • Weebler I
            El Weeblerito I
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 31094
            • 1,459
            • 1,648
            • 54,550

            #395
            Originally posted by TheBoxingfan101
            looks like nick halling and jim watt are going to be doing the commentary,
            both are on sky sports news now,
            hope watt isnt biased towards groves like last time
            What was the point in getting Malignaggi over if not to commentate?

            Comment

            • Weebler I
              El Weeblerito I
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 31094
              • 1,459
              • 1,648
              • 54,550

              #396
              Originally posted by Booty Dew
              lololol

              ''The truth is the truth and the truth hurts'' - Angel Garcia

              -Groves has faster hands
              -Groves hits harder (debatable but he at least matches him)
              -Groves has better footwork and balance
              -Groves has faster feet
              -Groves moves better
              -Groves has a better defence
              -Groves has better punch technique
              -Groves has better timing
              -Groves has a better jab
              -Froch has a better chin
              -Froch has better stamina
              These two may be all Froch needs.

              Comment

              • MisterDeclanCor
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Aug 2013
                • 384
                • 23
                • 33
                • 6,691

                #397
                Originally posted by Hull Slayer
                I met Froch and he's one of the nicest, most down to earth people you can meet.

                Just turns into a bit of a tit whenever he talks about himself.
                Fanastic sig pic!!

                Comment

                • LacedUp
                  Still Smokin'
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 29171
                  • 781
                  • 381
                  • 132,163

                  #398
                  Originally posted by Weebler I
                  What was the point in getting Malignaggi over if not to commentate?
                  I think he is going to commentate?

                  They said that on Sky yesterday.

                  Comment

                  • jas
                    Voice of Reason
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 22501
                    • 933
                    • 908
                    • 1,059,614

                    #399
                    Originally posted by Booty Dew
                    lololol

                    ''The truth is the truth and the truth hurts'' - Angel Garcia

                    -Groves has faster hands
                    -Groves hits harder (debatable but he at least matches him)
                    -Groves has better footwork and balance
                    -Groves has faster feet
                    -Groves moves better
                    -Groves has a better defence
                    -Groves has better punch technique
                    -Groves has better timing
                    -Groves has a better jab
                    -Froch has a better chin
                    -Froch has better stamina
                    most people thought herrera beat garcia - truth hurts!



                    View Poll Results: Who WON: Mauricio Herrera OR Danny Garcia? (POLL)
                    Mauricio Herrera 279 83.53%
                    Danny Garcia 34 10.18%
                    Draw 21 6.29%

                    froch has more experience!
                    froch is better at guaging range!
                    FROCH HAS REINFORCED IRON CHIN
                    FROCH IS WORLD CHAMP
                    froch has better trainer!
                    FROCH HAS HIS LEGACY ON THE LINE!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • jas
                      Voice of Reason
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 22501
                      • 933
                      • 908
                      • 1,059,614

                      #400
                      WWHOS WATCHING BARRERA VS JUAREZ, why the fk do they always show the follwing fights on boxnation:

                      barrera juarez
                      marquez barrera
                      de la hoya pacquaio

                      some good fights but change it up !¬!!!!!!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP