Originally posted by APPONO ASTOS
Am I going to accuse him of being a cheat without evidence? No.
Marquez has not looked faster to me than he did earlier in his career. He has never been all that fast. His combinations are executed with perfect timing and technique. Stronger and bulkier could be a result of PED'S. However they could also be a result of working with a guy who is a world class S&C coach.
I know the guy is shady, and it was always going to create controversy for anyone to work with him because of his past. But this guy works/ed with many world class athletes so he is an expert on the training and nutrition. You don't get to train with an athlete like Usain Bolt if you don't know what you are doing.
Marquez has been working with memo since 2011 and he has gotten bulkier but it hasn't been overnight. In 2011 he didnt look as good as in 2012. There has been a gradual improvement in his physique that could have been the result of a combination of a proper diet and training regiment conducted by a world class coach. Although i wouldn't rule out the possibility that he has been given an illegal substance, I will not trash a guys career and label him a drug cheat on an presumption of guilt. I want to see some proof. Whether it be a drug test or some other credible evidence.
Is there a difference between steroid acne and regular acne?
I couldn't really see the acne in the weigh in photos clearly (they were blurry) and the pics on google are too small. Also, during the fight I tried to see them and I could not get a good look at the supposed acne (movement, angles, hands blocking chest , etc). From a photo i would think it would be difficult to tell what is acne, a rash, allergic reaction, or some other skin condition. I am not a dermatologist.
I think that one of the most troubling things about this is that people have already made up there minds. There will be people who will say he is a cheat even if he never fails a drug test for the rest of his career and goes on olympic testing. They will say "... Oh Heredia is just a great chemist... his drugs are undetectable...etc." So evidence that goes against their belief will be discarded or rationalized (confirmation bias). Likewise, if Marquez fails a drug test some of his fans will come up with an excuse to try to explain away the results. There are such things as false positives and false negatives so a good testing agency will have multiple samples from which to test. If Marquez fails a test (multiple samples to rule out false positives) which procedure has not been compromised and is unbiased I will have to reasses my attitude toward Marquez.I am just uncomfortable calling someone a cheat without concrete evidence.
Comment