Interesting Alex Ariza Video Interview On the Mayweather Fight

[Evol]

Yes it is new. Find one post taken from over a year ago where the term "Ariza Shakes" was used and I'll green K you and give you a million points. You won't find it because there are none.

It is Freddie Roach who put that sh+t out there which is why Ariza is suing him.

ariza shakes was brought up when alex cleared things up saying all he gives manny is some protien shakes. but heres a quick search i was able to find the term ariza shakes posted on 10/13. this was before rios failed the drug test and this was before pac/bradley rematch where roach said he wasnt sure what was in the shakes ariza be giving to manny. i know theres more but im not about to search thru every post.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615375

[MRCHOKEaMF]

20 PEOPLE ARE A MAJORITY. of the Millions that watched, press row, espn, commentators, this site. lol

[Kuyukut]

To get a sizable number you'd need a larger sample than 20 people considering the fact that the fight was viewed by millions. I'll go with the 100+ press scores and the majority of the people online and in person who I've spoken to... Hell, the showtime commentators even had Floyd winning.

the decisions that fraud gets the nod from the 2 judges are actually not based on the fight itself. it’s a business decision that needs to be made.

it's a corrupt world out there.

[MRCHOKEaMF]

the decisions that fraud gets the nod from the 2 judges are actually not based on the fight itself. it’s a business decision that needs to be made.

it's a corrupt world out there.

lol, RUG

[Kuyukut]

20 PEOPLE ARE A MAJORITY. of the Millions that watched, press row, espn, commentators, this site. lol

brainiac, i said its a random good example that can represent the majority.

[MRCHOKEaMF]

brainiac, i said its a random good example that can represent the majority.

NAH its definitely not a GOOD EXAMPLE. RUG
It only represents a majority if there was only 9 people watching the fight and we KNOW BETTER! lol RUG

[MRCHOKEaMF]

nah its definitely not a good example. Rug
it only represents a majority if there was only 9 people watching the fight and we know better! Lol rug

see what i did or is that over your head

[Evol]

Yes it is new. Find one post taken from over a year ago where the term "Ariza Shakes" was used and I'll green K you and give you a million points. You won't find it because there are none.

It is Freddie Roach who put that sh+t out there which is why Ariza is suing him.

heres more. im not gonna waste my time and go thru 10000000 threads. now green k me and go fuck urself.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=368564

more --

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=477147

more -- this one was made by a pac fan but this just goes to show u that the term ariza shakes has been going on for years now.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=431046

[Kuyukut]

NAH its definitely not a GOOD EXAMPLE. RUG
It only represents a majority if there was only 9 people watching the fight and we KNOW BETTER! lol RUG

you're dumb. that all i can say about you.

[Johnwoo8686]

LOL took you forever to find one thread based on an actual article where Ariza's protein shakes were discussed. Floyd fans never made up the Ariza shakes they were something that were brought up by the press and confirmed by Freddie Roach. Alright I'll give you your green for being a good sport