Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arums says Pacquiao vs. Bradley II PPV numbers "A disappointment"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Funny how most of you guys are trying to say how good these numbers are.

    When Arum himself is disappointed in the numbers.
    Anything to protect Pacquiao I guesd

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by ELPacman View Post
      Well your part of the black community or no? lol
      How is that your conclusion? Hate to disappoint lil Hitler but no I'm not. Is every Pacquiao fan Filipino? In your world, apparently they are lol.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
        Those are great numbers for that fight. Better than the first, aren't they?
        Little under 900k.

        If anything, it shows there's a difference between China and here.

        Bradley was coming off the Marquez PPV win and was better known than the first time out

        Comment


        • #54
          IMO Pacquaio's not as big of a draw because he was put to sleep. You can blame these numbers on Bradley, but the fact is the first Bradley fight sold 890K, since then Bradley engaged in the FOTY and a PPV win over Marquez (Pacquiao's conqueror). Why does this fight do over 100K less than the first one? It has to be Marquez's destruction of Pacquaio.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by MGMGRAND View Post
            Funny how most of you guys are trying to say how good these numbers are.

            When Arum himself is disappointed in the numbers.
            Anything to protect Pacquiao I guesd
            Compared to Pacs numbers in the past they are bad. Compared to anyone not named Mayweather they are good.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Ephesians View Post
              Compared to Pacs numbers in the past they are bad. Compared to anyone not named Mayweather they are good.
              If Bob is openly admitting that he is disappointed in the numbers then it says a lot.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                If Bob is openly admitting that he is disappointed in the numbers then it says a lot.
                Arum is a lawyer and a promoter (salesman). You can't believe a word he says but when he says he made money on it, you can bet he is happy about his financial reaping from the fight. Otherwise, he would avoid commenting on the financial outcome at all.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by mathed View Post
                  Arum is a lawyer and a promoter (salesman). You can't believe a word he says but when he says he made money on it, you can bet he is happy about his financial reaping from the fight. Otherwise, he would avoid commenting on the financial outcome at all.
                  Yesterday I was lying, today I am.....ahh never mind

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                    Those are great numbers for that fight. Better than the first, aren't they?
                    not when they were expecting 1.2 mil at least. i think its bout same as first one

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Check_hooks View Post
                      The important thing is that everyone involved made money

                      It was a great fight with two top P4P guys swinging for the fences

                      800k vs Bradley is a huge success.

                      I think Bradley vs JMM did like 350k buys
                      ya true but it sounds like arum is going to screw pac. he wouldn answer the question when asked if pac would get more then the 6 million he got before the fight since the buys were so low. If he tries to give pac 6 million thats bs a lot of people tune in to see pac lose but its still pac they paying to see

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP