Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which one of the fabulous 4 would give Ray Robinson the most trouble?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Which one of the fabulous 4 would give Ray Robinson the most trouble?

    SRR is the GOAT but which of the 4 greats from the 80s would be the best and most effective style match up for him?
    42
    Leonard
    19.05%
    8
    Duran
    14.29%
    6
    Hearns
    21.43%
    9
    Hagler
    45.24%
    19

  • #2
    Considering the type of guys that actually beat him (Jake Lamotta, Carmen Basilio to name a few) I think Hagler would present the biggest problems for him. Power, chin, heart. Not that any of the others couldn't beat him I just think Hagler would be a tough test.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Joshua Child View Post
      Considering the type of guys that actually beat him (Jake Lamotta, Carmen Basilio to name a few) I think Hagler would present the biggest problems for him. Power, chin, heart. Not that any of the others couldn't beat him I just think Hagler would be a tough test.
      Not to mention he fought out of the southpaw stance.
      Last edited by Ephesians; 05-09-2014, 04:01 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Marv definitely

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by djtmal View Post
          Marv definitely
          How many southpaws did SRR defeat in his career? I am not sure off the top of my head.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hagler and it's not even close.

            Comment


            • #7
              All of them would, I'm not even sure he gets past Hearns. As for the most trouble I'd say Hagler.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Ephesians View Post
                How many southpaws did SRR defeat in his career? I am not sure off the top of my head.
                don't know i am not from that era, but from watching what footage is out on him, prime marv would be a real test at 160...@ 147 he'd be looking in the mirror when it comes to srl...

                Comment


                • #9
                  LaMotta and Basilio were much better at cutting the ring off than Hagler was. Hagler was actually a very mediocre pressure fighter. The Hearns fight flattered him a great deal.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Ray Stokes View Post
                    LaMotta and Basilio were much better at cutting the ring off than Hagler was. Hagler was actually a very mediocre pressure fighter. The Hearns fight flattered him a great deal.
                    I'm not saying those guys were chumps. Basilio was a hell of a pressure fighter who puts many modern "in-fighters" to shame in terms of that specific talent. The question was who would pose the biggest problems for SRR. Hearns might present some issues but SRR was 5'-11" so the height advantage wouldn't be all that big.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP