Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Amir Khan Eyes Maidana Rematch, Guerrero, Porter

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    That is what I want to hear from Khan. Enough with the Floyd talk. If he beats a top name like he just mentioned then the fight would be legitimized.

    Comment


    • #62
      InYourFace

      You truly are a ****** probably a Floyd stan

      Its impossible to debate with a guy who just moves the goal post and never acknowledges anything

      Keep trying mate, i give you credit for being a Khan hater, if it makes you feel any better

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by InYourFace View Post
        Khan isn't being measured by a different set of rules, but when you call out the best name in boxing there is no easy route to get that fight, you have to show and prove, not fight an easy opponent for your first fight at welter weight. If Khan want's the easy route he should keep Mayweather's name out of his mouth.
        Again you live in some kind of lalaland of yours, who ? cares what you think? you're mentioning your opinion as Public opinion lmao you still haven't answered how Ortiz,Guerrero etc. got a shot at so called best P4P fighter in the world?

        Same Collazo is ranked higher than Thurman in WBC, Collazo is also ranked #2 by WBA. you suck with your logics, Thurman can't sell a phoone booth why should Khan fight him The public wanted Khan vs Mayweather fight more than Maidana thats why Khan won the Poll babe.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Lullaby View Post
          loss* not lost* also Peterson was juiced up in Khan's fight and should I mention the 2 points deductions, Man in the Hat? Dodgy ref etc etc.?

          Khan won that fight despite of all that, he was Robbed I repeat ROBBED. GTFO .
          You mention the two point deductions but what about the gift knockdown in the first round? And if I recall correctly Peterson never tested positive for the first fight with Khan. Not hating on Khan just saying. Keep up the good work. I'm loving this thread so far.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by InYourFace View Post
            Boxing is about fighting the right fights, if Brook beats Porter that's a good fight for people in the UK. Broner is considered to be **** now, if Khan would have beat Broner before Maidana did then your point will be valid. The boxing public disses Guerrero now after his lost to Mayweather with all the bull**** he talked about Mayweather just to get beat convincingly. So those 2 opponents doesn't do anything for Khan.

            Keith Thurman is advertised as the boogyman nobody want's to fight, and he's undefeated. So a victory over Thurman will put Khan in a position where people will apply pressure on Mayweather to fight Khan, other than that outside of beating Porter if he wins against Brook or fighting Maidana again to take advantage of the recent shine Maidana has garnered after his good performance in his fight with Mayweather. Khan needs those three victories on his record next, not all three but any one of them will be good for a Mayweather fight. Anything less than will be futile.
            You need to live in the real world. No one in the wider public knows who Keith Thurman is. Broner took a loss but he's still a huge name and people know Guerrero by association with Mayweather.

            To sell a PPV fight, you need to be known. Keith Thurman is co-main eventing at the StubHub Centre. The guy is not relevant to the wider audience.

            Originally posted by InYourFace View Post
            Lies, Alexander Vs Brook never happened because Brook suffered 2 injuries during training camp.
            Alexander pulled out once and Brook pulled out twice. Sorry you were unaware of this. You're welcome for the information.

            Originally posted by InYourFace View Post
            Because Khan suffered 2 knockouts and a lost to Peterson.
            What does that even mean? How is it a response to what I said? You said Khan ducks people and Guerrero doesn't so why is Khan's resume much better than Guerreros? Weird.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Pan-Africanist View Post
              You mention the two point deductions but what about the gift knockdown in the first round? And if I recall correctly Peterson never tested positive for the first fight with Khan. Not hating on Khan just saying. Keep up the good work. I'm loving this thread so far.
              No but he did admit to using it before the Khan fight. Khan fought a PEDs cheat and still won in most people's eyes. It's incredible that he's actually given **** for that fight.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
                Last time i check Khan won Floyds official poll...lol@forums

                Fact is if the Ghost is good enough for Floyd, he damn sure is good enough for Khan....

                Stop being a ****head all ur life mate, u sound like a first class prat...changing the goal post for Khan
                Now I'm being a ****head because you want me to agree with your set of rules and views of Amir Khan, GROW UP. We have our differences about Amir Khan but I can choose to agree to disagree with your sentiments towards the subject. However, if Khan would have done what Guerrero did at the space and time Guerrero achieved it, then yes Khan will deserve a fight with Mayweather, but he didn't, so Khan doesn't deserve a Mayweather fight based on his merits.

                Ellerbe told the press that Khan didn't win Mayweather's poll and that the poll had a glitch that needed to be worked out. So, after they fixed the poll 100s of votes they then added to Maidana's side which equaled the landslide victories Maidana had over ESPN and several boxing websites polls.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Pan-Africanist View Post
                  You mention the two point deductions but what about the gift knockdown in the first round? And if I recall correctly Peterson never tested positive for the first fight with Khan. Not hating on Khan just saying. Keep up the good work. I'm loving this thread so far.
                  He admitted using them for the first fight

                  Said he'd been using them for some time, low test..

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Pan-Africanist View Post
                    You mention the two point deductions but what about the gift knockdown in the first round? And if I recall correctly Peterson never tested positive for the first fight with Khan. Not hating on Khan just saying. Keep up the good work. I'm loving this thread so far.


                    Are you serious? really really? lmao.

                    PEDerson himself admitted that he took PED's in first fight against Khan. Go and google that thing might improve your knowlege on the scenario. Also Khan dropped PEDerson twice in first round but was awared only a single KD. Khan won that fight against all odds was heavily robbed. Give credit to Khan for taking that fight in the DC when he was the Unified champ and could've easily taken the fight to the Uk that fight hurt Khan's career bad and camp leading up to Garcia fight was a mess as PEDerson's rematch was cancelled.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                      No but he did admit to using it before the Khan fight. Khan fought a PEDs cheat and still won in most people's eyes. It's incredible that he's actually given **** for that fight.
                      Good stuff. Wasn't aware of that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP