Khan wants Guerrero - then Porter or Maidana rematch.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MONGOOSE66
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2011
    • 7739
    • 1,609
    • 620
    • 29,199

    #61
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    You must be new to boxing.

    Khan signed a rematch with Peterson who subsequently failed a drug test.

    Bradley turned down the chance to fight Khan using the line "What if I lose to Khan?"
    Is he still on the drugs? Did he quit fighting? and as far as Bradley, I remember he had a bigger name to fight at that time. Regardless this is a new day. Khan needs to fight guys who matter. I already named a few of them. Its not hard to see why he picks the fighters he's picking. The last guy was a joke in the sense that he Beat a mentally broke down Ortiz. Khan has all the tools to be the best but he lacks patience and gets mentally lazy in the ring.

    Comment

    • Adamjr91
      Ear fingerer
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2013
      • 4218
      • 170
      • 550
      • 14,320

      #62
      Originally posted by P4P_No1
      It's not a bad idea to be honest. Also in Khan's case it lets Floyd get a little older, a little slower, a little more "shopworn" to an extent. Plus it gives Khan another fight at a weight before he (in all honestly it does look like it's going to happen) fights Floyd.

      Would prefer a Porter/Maidana fight as Guerrero seems to have just disappeared off the map since his loss against Floyd. What's going on with him btw?
      Guerrero thinks GBP aren't paying him enough or delivering big enough fights He even went as far to take them to court (and lost)

      In conclusion, Guererro is a ****.

      Comment

      • takingaim
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 2659
        • 185
        • 213
        • 3,625

        #63
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        So why did you say he would knock Khan out?
        Based on Khan's performance against Diaz. He looked awful, and in combination of moving up to WW, I thought it'd be too much for him.

        Originally posted by Box-Office
        Sounds like excuses doesn't it?

        Because before you were quite confident:
        Collazo's a bum because he fought like a bum. I was also confident that Collazo would win based on Khan's awful performance against Diaz. There's no contradiction in what I said. Try harder.

        Comment

        • LA_2_Vegas
          Legendary Nights
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 7644
          • 673
          • 1,517
          • 33,333

          #64
          Originally posted by MONGOOSE66
          Is there anything wrong with repeating a fight that was competitive? If it was close why not? Unless he doesn't think he can whip him easily.
          As for Bradley ducking Khan. I don't know bout that. Did you hear this from Kahn or Bradley? Khan isn't an elite top 3 fighter. I'm not saying he couldn't beat Bradley but I don't see him shaking in his boots over him. Just not that type of guy.
          The rematch with Peterson was signed and well into the promotional phase at the time Lamont failed a drug test - at which point he also admitted to being on PEDs in their first fight. Khan decided to keep the date and took on whoever was available, which happened to be Danny Garcia.

          Comment

          • Box-Office
            Russo Guy
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2013
            • 7620
            • 245
            • 483
            • 14,068

            #65
            Originally posted by MONGOOSE66
            Is he still on the drugs? Did he quit fighting? and as far as Bradley, I remember he had a bigger name to fight at that time.
            At the time Khan-Bradley Unification was the most talked about bouts and it was realistic as Bradley was with Shaw. It's only after almost a year of quacking and after fighting shot to **** Casamayor that the Pacquiao fight was made.

            Why should Khan give someone a chance to make $ off of him who basically put his life at risk especially because it is boxing and not baseball.

            Originally posted by MONGOOSE66
            Regardless this is a new day. Khan needs to fight guys who matter. I already named a few of them. Its not hard to see why he picks the fighters he's picking. The last guy was a joke in the sense that he Beat a mentally broke down Ortiz. Khan has all the tools to be the best but he lacks patience and gets mentally lazy in the ring.
            So, now Collazo doesn't matter?

            Khan named Porter, Guerrero and Maidana rematches as December possibilities, so yes he is trying to fight meaningful fights not that he wasn't in one recently.
            Last edited by Box-Office; 05-10-2014, 05:55 PM.

            Comment

            • Adamjr91
              Ear fingerer
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2013
              • 4218
              • 170
              • 550
              • 14,320

              #66
              Originally posted by takingaim
              Based on Khan's performance against Diaz. He looked awful, and in combination of moving up to WW, I thought it'd be too much for him.



              Collazo's a bum because he fought like a bum. I was also confident that Collazo would win based on Khan's awful performance against Diaz. There's no contradiction in what I said. Try harder.
              Collazo was going to blast out Khan but because he had no answer for Khans speed and was totally dominated he is now a bum?

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #67
                Originally posted by MONGOOSE66
                Is he still on the drugs? Did he quit fighting? and as far as Bradley, I remember he had a bigger name to fight at that time. Regardless this is a new day. Khan needs to fight guys who matter. I already named a few of them. Its not hard to see why he picks the fighters he's picking. The last guy was a joke in the sense that he Beat a mentally broke down Ortiz. Khan has all the tools to be the best but he lacks patience and gets mentally lazy in the ring.
                Peterson is at 140lbs and is pretty irrelevent, Khan obviously has no qualms about fighting him since he signed a rematch. And he clearly has no issue facing Bradley since he agreed several times to fight him but he's with Top Rank now

                Comment

                • MONGOOSE66
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 7739
                  • 1,609
                  • 620
                  • 29,199

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Box-Office
                  At the time Khan-Bradley Unification was the most talked about bouts and it was realistic as Bradley was with Shaw. It's only after almost a year of quacking and after fighting shot to **** Casamayor that the Pacquiao fight was made.

                  Why should Khan give someone a chance to make $ off of him who basically put his life at risk especially because it is boxing and not baseball.



                  So, now Collazo doesn't matter?

                  Yes, and Khan names Porter, Guerrero and Maidana rematches as December possibilities, so yes he is trying to fight meaningful fights not that he wasn't in one recently.
                  So you honestly believe that Collazo is EQUALLY as talented as Khan?
                  You know I get the money thing in boxing and maneuvering yourself into top position. It just gets so fkn old. These young kids want something for nothing. The boxing elite are becoming a bunch of spoiled kids. I can't stand spoiled kids boxing or not.

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #69
                    Originally posted by takingaim
                    Based on Khan's performance against Diaz. He looked awful, and in combination of moving up to WW, I thought it'd be too much for him.



                    Collazo's a bum because he fought like a bum. I was also confident that Collazo would win based on Khan's awful performance against Diaz. There's no contradiction in what I said. Try harder.
                    Other than you said Khan would get knocked out by your man Collazo, and when he gets decisively beaten he's suddenly a bum.

                    Nope. No contradiction there.

                    Comment

                    • LacedUp
                      Still Smokin'
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 29171
                      • 781
                      • 381
                      • 132,163

                      #70
                      Originally posted by MONGOOSE66
                      So you honestly believe that Collazo is EQUALLY as talented as Khan?
                      You know I get the money thing in boxing and maneuvering yourself into top position. It just gets so fkn old. These young kids want something for nothing. The boxing elite are becoming a bunch of spoiled kids. I can't stand spoiled kids boxing or not.
                      Half of the posters here picked Collazo to stop Khan.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP