My best example I can use is if we're playing pool (8 ball)
And I'm by far a better player than you... and I scratch on the 8 ball... YES, I lost, but that does not prove that you're a better player, does it?
I am assuming that Rustam Ibragimov is actually Sultan Ibragimov? Did anyone notice that somehow Bloodshed voted numerous times? How can you vote more then once? It only lets me vote one time!
...Yeah and all his votes went to the black heavies and none to the white heavies. Coincidence???? I think not.
What is telling is what all of the fighters that he voted for have in common. If there's still someone who hasn't pegged his agenda on these boards, then that ought to clue them in.
...ha ha I didn't see this post but had commented on noticing the same thing. He tries to call people out for being racist when he is the biggest one on the boards.
I picked Toney, because he is by far the best fighter in the division. I'm not 100% sure he's the best Heavyweight, though. I don't know that he's big enough to beat the larger HW's. Wlad has no chin. Brewster laid him out, so I don't see how he could be leading this poll. I'd love to see Lamon do big things, but he still has quite a bit to prove. This division sucks, and none of these guys will go down in the history books as a great other than "Lights Out". He won't go down as a great HW, but as a great fighter for what he did in his climb from Middleweight to Heavyweight. I think Brewster's got the best shot at a legacy, but unless some guys step up in weight or some young guys come into the picture, it would be hard to even call it a legacy. The lack of decent competition and the fact that undeserving challengers keep getting title shots makes this the worst crop of HW's I can recall, and it doesn't look to get any better.
Comment