My point is simple. You can't judge who's best by "who beat who" alone.
If you did, McCall and Rahman would be just as good as Lewis because they split head to head fights. But we all know Lewis was much better than both combined because of his other fights and accomplishments.
Another example would be to say that James "Buster" Douglas was better than Iron Mike Tyson.
That's why I say Wlad has a slight edge over Brewster "IMO" as who's currently the best, simply because Wlad has the better resume and I doubt Brewster would beat him again in a rematch.
Like I said earlier, I had a hard time choosing between the two because I am a Brewster fan too.
I am assuming that Rustam Ibragimov is actually Sultan Ibragimov? Did anyone notice that somehow Bloodshed voted numerous times? How can you vote more then once? It only lets me vote one time!
To me none of them stand out. There is no real way, outside of a tournament, to tell out of this group. Still like I said before, right now being the best isn't saying much.
Did anyone notice that somehow Bloodshed voted numerous times? How can you vote more then once? It only lets me vote one time!
What is telling is what all of the fighters that he voted for have in common. If there's still someone who hasn't pegged his agenda on these boards, then that ought to clue them in.
wow, i have toney, but how can anyone have wlad over brew when brewster beat him?????
way too many wlad nughuggers on here
In my book Wlad punched himself out
My best example I can use is if we're playing pool (8 ball)
And I'm by far a better player than you... and I scratch on the 8 ball... YES, I lost, but that does not prove that you're a better player, does it?
Comment