It certainly appeared that way to me since you're trying to present supposed facts to another poster without a source.
Clearly it did since you responded with this. You're clearly implying that his history wouldn't impede his ability to be part of a new ownership, which I clearly disagreed with.
Clearly it did since you responded with this. You're clearly implying that his history wouldn't impede his ability to be part of a new ownership, which I clearly disagreed with.
Also note, Floyd's "history" won't stop anyone from doing anything. If you think the Clippers owner is the only bad person who owns a team, you are clearly ignorant.

Comment