Valuev was a plodding bum and did uou actually see the fight it was a freaking circus act if you think that performance by either man makes them a credible opponent you're an idiot
Ooh look its LacedUps alt account, do you really need two accounts to argue your point lmao!
Let me ask why that is so important? Its not a measuringstick for greatness ar all. At least not without mentioning what version of those HOF'ers they fought. Take Lummox for instance. How much does it count that he beat a shot to **** Tyson? Or Holmes beating the corpse of Ali?
Who is to say that beating a faded version of an ATG is better than beating a very good prime fighter? How can you measure that?
Did you seriously just say that beating ATGs/HOFers isn't a measuring stick for greatness?
Resume is THE most important criteria for determining how great a fighter is. Anyone can look good fighting bums. Fighting top opponents is the best way of determining a fighter's skills.
Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, lists Holmes's win over Ali to be one of his best wins, or even a good win. I honestly don't know why you even brought that up.
Lewis has a better resume than Wlad. His win over Holyfield alone is better than any of Wlad's wins.
Did you seriously just say that beating ATGs/HOFers isn't a measuring stick for greatness?
Resume is THE most important criteria for determining how great a fighter is. Anyone can look good fighting bums. Fighting top opponents is the best way of determining a fighter's skills.
Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, lists Holmes's win over Ali to be one of his best wins, or even a good win. I honestly don't know why you even brought that up.
Lewis has a better resume than Wlad. His win over Holyfield alone is better than any of Wlad's wins.
Comment