The Greatness of Wladimir Klitschko

[LacedUp]

wlad is far more entertaining than floyd Mayweather, he dominates his opponents. His last oppoent Lepai was a masterclass on how to break down a C level fighter.

Mayweather lost to a B level fighter in Maidana, as did Broner...

Wlad=best ever.....

Leapai was certainly not a C level fighter.

He's D at best.

[Weltschmerz]

Leapai was certainly not a C level fighter.

He's D at best.

No he's not. He is a C level fighter and everybody knows it. You always try to discredit Wladimir in the lamest ways.

[Daddy T]

Wlad is like a ford focus ... sure it's a great car and all ... but it ain't gonna get the wife's knickers wet.

Somebody like Tyson on the other hand is more like Lamborghini ... yeah, you can't see out the back window and if you go over a speed bump it will break the suspension ... but ****ing hell it's exciting.

[LacedUp]

Is Floyd Mayweather an ATG?

Are you saying Mayweather has never faced the #2?

Either way you want to put it, Mayweather's resume is at least 10 x better than Wlad's.

[LacedUp]

No he's not. He is a C level fighter and everybody knows it. You always try to discredit Wladimir in the lamest ways.

How in the hell is a guy that got knocked out by C and E level fighters in Kevin Johnson and Baden Oui a C level fighter?

Leapai was a joke. I'm not even discrediting Wlad, because everyone knows Leapai is crap. You trying to pass him off as a decent fighter is laughable.

[BennyST]

There is simply no arguing with someone when they say this list: Povetkin, Haye, Ibragamov, Byrd (amazingly one of these natural light heavyweights that these guys always talk about not being able to compete is consistently listed as Wlads second best win....amazing that!) and Peter is better than: Muhammad Ali....don't need to list any more, but Ali, Quarry, Foster, The Chuv, Ellis for instance.

When people start bringing up a resume of guys that have never won a title in an era with five titles available in each division and 40 year old shot fighters, you know there is nothing there.

I just love it that much of this started with Frazier being too small, yet a natural light heavyweight that gave Vitali trouble, before Vitali quit, is consistently listed as among Wlads very, very best wins and while he's defended as an excellent win for Wlad, Frazier is a no hoper midget that wouldn't stand a chance. You just can't make this stuff up.

[BennyST]

You know things are even worse when Weltz starts trying to argue, quite honestly too, that Wlads resume of wins and losses is more impressive than Fraziers. You realise then that some brains just don't quite work the way they should and there is no point in even bothering to try arguing a rational point with someone that lost.

[LacedUp]

You know things are even worse when Weltz starts trying to argue, quite honestly too, that Wlads resume of wins and losses is more impressive than Fraziers. You realise then that some brains just don't quite work the way they should and there is no point in even bothering to try arguing a rational point with someone that lost.

That guy just doesn't know anything about boxing.

Nothing that comes out of his mouth surprises me anymore.

[Daddy T]

That guy just doesn't know anything about boxing.

Nothing that comes out of his mouth surprises me anymore.

He knows a lot about race though

[Weltschmerz]

Well this thread was actually just intended for praising Wladimir's accomplishments. I don't even care too much discussing Frazier, there are other threads floating around for that. I just don't see any logic in rating Frazier higher on the ATG list, and I know for a fact that many here agree with me.