WBC,IBF,WBA,RING use to be all you needed to be undisputed even when Zab Judah was champ in 2005...when did having the WBO become a criteria?
When did the WBO become a respected belt?
Collapse
-
-
Criteria[edit]
1920-1963, a boxer who held both the NYSAC and NBA (WBA) titles simultaneously.
1963-1983, a boxer who held both the WBA and WBC titles simultaneously.
1983-2007, a boxer who held the WBA, WBC, and IBF titles simultaneously.
2007-Present, a boxer who holds the WBA, WBC, IBF and WBO titles simultaneously. (By February 2007, All four major Organisations were recognised by each other).Last edited by jas; 04-21-2014, 02:07 PM.Comment
-
interesting..thankshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of...xing_champions
criteria[edit]
1920-1963, a boxer who held both the nysac and nba (wba) titles simultaneously.
1963***8211;1983, a boxer who held both the wba and wbc titles simultaneously.
1983***8211;2007, a boxer who held the wba, wbc, and ibf titles simultaneously.
2007***8211;present, a boxer who holds the wba, wbc, ibf and wbo titles simultaneously. (by february 2007, all four major organisations were recognised by each other).Comment
-
-
Some big names have held the WBO title over the last...what is it now, 20 years? Guys like Eubank, Benn, Calzaghe, Wlad, Rigo, Narvaez, Pac, Bradley....it's the names that hold your belt that legitimise, bit like Holmes in the 80s dropping his WBC/WBA titles for the IBF.Comment
Comment