Comments Thread For: Marquez Felt Pacquiao Looked Good in Bradley Victory

[Jcsuper]

you must think marquez was winning that last fight before the KO. Marquez was getting walked down with a broken bloody nose till pac got careless. Pac just outboxed bradley who outboxed marquez.

First - Triangle theories mean **** and you should know that
Second - Marquez not only send Pac on the canvas one time but two times, so stop acting like it was a one side beat down till a lucky punch happened
Third - It was clear as hell that for this fight JMM didnt want to go to the scorecard, he knew he would get robbed again. So he sat on his punches more and went for the big punch, it was a risky strategy because Pac, being faster got the edge beside the big punches that JMM landed. At the end of the day, JMM's strategy worked, and doctors needed smellign salts to wake up manny.

[Jcsuper]

This version of Pac was feinting Bradley on the Ropes. No lucky punch this time and JMM knows it

When you knockdown a sparring partner with that punch, when you knock down a guy TWO times in the fight. WHen you're one of the greatest counterpuncher of the last 25 years old, lucky punches dont exist.

When guys like JMM, Hopkins, Floyd, Toney, Ward throw a punch, that's because they have a reason to throw it and they have a strategy behind it. There are no lucky punches at this level of boxing.

[ironmt]

Marquez landed the same counter right that he has always landed on Pacquiao but he had time to sit on his punch and time Manny coming in. Guess next we hear of you will be in the papers struck by lightning.

Comprehension seems to elude you. Where did I say that Marquez wouldn't land the straight right that he has always landed on Pacquiao? Maybe this time you will get It, again, read It slowly and a few times to be sure that you might understand......................... Marquez will not land the homerun KO counter punch In the fifth fight.

[ailicec]

It was 100% a LUCKY punch!

Just like the one PACKY landed on Hatton. Explain the DIFFERENCE?

[GRUSTLER]

Comprehension seems to elude you. Where did I say that Marquez wouldn't land the straight right that he has always landed on Pacquiao? Maybe this time you will get It, again, read It slowly and a few times to be sure that you might understand......................... Marquez will not land the homerun KO counter punch In the fifth fight.

I get what you are saying but don't agree with your "lucky punch" theory because Marquez could be seen training in sparring using that same punch and it working on his sparring partner. You can't seem to get or swallow the fact that Pacquiao got his ass put to sleep for 5 minutes. Each time both fighters met Marquez was/is the fighter who adjusted to Pacquiao's style not the other way around so saying Marquez cannot land that punch again makes no sense and holds no weight because Manny after all of this time STILL can't figure out a way to dominate Marquez's style. I would not bet on it if I was you. Manny is gun shy and too cautious. Marquez took a chunk of Pacquiao's heart with him that night.

[McLeechin]

I'm gonna give you a green K for being a good boy and hating on Mexicans! I'm gonna put a star next to your name ok.

I didn't know running is a racial thing. Should I have said DUCK instead?

[SceneSpectator!]

I think JMM tune for another fight with Pac has changed tremendously this time.. Glad to hear him saying this time that a 5th fight with Pac is just “a natural way to do!” My guessed, an 80% done should JMM wins against Alvarado.

[boxingfocus]

Just like the one PACKY landed on Hatton. Explain the DIFFERENCE?

Hatton was being battered by Pacquiao. Hatton wasn't in that fight at any point.

Marquez was being battered by Pacquiao, who was in the ascendency when he got caught napping on the way in (pun intended). The Pacquiao/Marquez VI fight was very competitive and Pacquiao had the upper and at the time of the kayo. The same could not be said of Pacquiao/Hatton which was a short, sweet, one sided destruction of my compatriot.

[Bigg Rigg]

Just like the one PACKY landed on Hatton. Explain the DIFFERENCE?

The difference is that it took jmm almost 40 rds to do that. Hatton was on the floor in the 1st rd and sleeping in the next rd.

[GRUSTLER]

I guess you didn't watch the 4th fight in its entirety. FYI Marquez had already knocked Pac down earlier in the fight with a furious right, and Pac was even walking backwards away from Marquez, so he didn't get that punch in full force. Marquez was highly inaccurate in that fight, the worst of his fights with Pac, his accuracy percentage was the lowest ever, yet every time he was able to catch Pac, he did hurt him. Anyone who SAW THE FIGHT could easily tell that the one with THE POWER for a knockout that night was Marquez, not Pac.

So the "chances" rant from yours is highly infantile. If Marquez does get the chance again in a 5th fight, he will get the job done again, unless Pac runs and runs and avoids confrontation like cowardly Bradley did (curiously, Bradley was brave enough to trade with Pacman twice and even with Provo, but he ran scared of Marquez all night, jabbing his way to a split decision, go figure out why).

Marquez fought one hell of a smart fight. He went to Pacquiao's body and took away his speed and set him up lovely. He took the punishment to get the final result. Pacquiao fans just can't absorb the fact that Pacquiao is not Superman so anything that happens not in his favor is luck or a Pacquiao mistake. Manny cold not dominate or decisively beat Marquez so a KO was a surprise but a Marquez convincing win was inevitable. A 5th fight will do more harm to Pacquiao than good.