If you have Pacquiao P4P #3 or above....
Collapse
-
You're the one who posted up his p4p list to be criticized. You're also the one who started this topic. Answer the question; or do you not have an answer?
If past fights and resume don't matter, why do you rank inactive fighters so highly on your p4p list?Comment
-
Ko or decision is doesn't matter because lost is a lost but why the hell Marquez was still in your top 4 p4p when he just lost his last fight recently? Care to explain?Comment
-
A suspect as Marquez may appear WRT PED use, Pacquiao looks 100 times more suspect. Do we need to go back to 2009 and discuss the Mayweather negotiations?Comment
-
pac was number 1 or 2 b4 marquez koed him
and he was messing up marquez b4 the one punch ko landed
that ko only sent him down to top 5-7
beating bradley whos top 3 should be enough to send him back to where he belong
not floyd nor ward has fought anyone inside top 5 p4p for the past 3 years and u put them in ur top 5 list
ur funnyComment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Thinking and actually doing the damn thing is two separate things. Pac should be #1 especially since he's beaten everybody he faced since 1999 and has the better resume. Based off reality here. Not what you think will happen. Your rewarding the coward here cong****!Last edited by jtommy; 04-15-2014, 03:19 AM.Comment
-
just stop bro.
your logic, or lack there of, is full of holes and i don think you get what the p4p list is all about.
theres a triangle situation here, Pac beat Bradley in 2012 and got robbed, JMM got a come from behind one punch KO against Pac, Bradley convincingly outboxed JMM, then most recently Pac convincingly beat Bradley.
Outside the triangle, Bradley barely survives Provodnikov and Pac humiliated Rios, who is a young hard hitting brawler, with only one loss and is 10 pounds bigger.
So how can you put JMM above both Bradley and Pac, when he had ONE shining moment, the ONE PUNCH KO, which he desperately needed since he was on his way to a TKO loss?Comment
Comment