If you have Pacquiao P4P #3 or above....

[Nay_Sayer]

Who was the last guy Mayweather beat who was P4P? Dont say Canelo.Canelo loosed to Trout. Pacquiaos win over Bradley is better than any win on Mayweathers record.

Mosley was P4P #3.

[Build That Wall]

Heres the list

Mayweather
Ward
Rigondeaux
Klitschko
Martinez
Pacquiao
Bradley
Marquez
Hopkins
Golovkin

[TyrantT316]

P4P was established to recognize the guys who would beat other fighters in different weight classes if size wasn't an issue. I think Pacman still ranks pretty high. Wins and losses aren't EVERYTHING. It's a combination of win/loss success, how you look in winning and style match ups.

Just because Froch wins a fight, that doesn't mean he is higher P4P than Pacman because I am sure many would agree that if weight weren't an issue, Pacman would beat Froch.

I think many forgot what P4P really means.

[Nay_Sayer]

You Pac-tards are on a roll today.

Answer me this, how in the hell can Pacquiao be P4P #3 or better when he has a recent loss that hasn't been avenged?

Do you Pac-tard not comprehend simple arithmetic?

Like I said before, NOBODY put Tarver @ P4P #1 the next day after he KO'ed Jones...

[-MAKAVELLI-]

sees red bar, clicks out of thread

[oc9979]

That's not a bad list, except Bradley beat Marquez pretty convincingly. In what world would you put Marquez above Bradley?

Good argument but you can't put Pacquiao over Marquez since he KOed him.
I am thinking that the best way would be Marquez, Pacquiao, and then Bradley.
or you could have Pacquiao, Bradley and Marquez

Bradley, Marquez, Hatton(Lineal 140lb Champ at the time with only loss at 147) Barrera, Morales, Clottey(considering he beat Cotto and his loss to Margarito is questionable since he broke both his hands in that fight plus there's the question of plaster.)

Clottey did not beat Cotto. Margarito win is not questionable either. He got injured and lost.
If you are going to apply that logic. We could all say that Pacquiao never beat Marquez because it 2 closed decision and 1 draw.

[Nay_Sayer]

Tarver only beat 1 top 5 fighter. Pacquiao has beaten several. The Bradley fight wasn't a fluke.

I'm still waiting for you to tell me who were the top 5 P4P fighters Pacquiao has beaten.

[Nay_Sayer]

Be specific what number is floyd and what number is maidana?

If Maidana KO's Mayweather in one round then I think Ward moves up to #1 and Maidana should enter the P4P rankings @ #2. Floyd would drop out of the top 5, IMO...

[Bigg Rigg]

show us ur top 5 ts so we can all lauh at it

[hugh grant]

Mosley was P4P #3.

SSM was never no3. He was last generations fighter when FLoyd fought him. SSM was considered no3 on the basis of beating Margarito now come on. Yes, Margarito beat Cotto. But then Pac just beat Bradley, the guy who beat JMM.!

You Pac-tards are on a roll today.

Answer me this, how in the hell can Pacquiao be P4P #3 or better when he has a recent loss that hasn't been avenged?

Do you Pac-tard not comprehend simple arithmetic?

.

Pac beat JMM 3 times already and he just beat Bradley who was JMMs daddy. When Duran lost to Hearns he didn't have to beat Hearns to regain reputation as one of the best in the world.

Good argument but you can't put Pacquiao over Marquez since he KOed him.
I am thinking that the best way would be Marquez, Pacquiao, and then Bradley.
or you could have Pacquiao, Bradley and Marquez
.

Pac beat Bradley.....JMMs daddy. So Pac is no1 p4p.