Did Pacquiao beat Bradley even easier, by wider margin, than the first fight?

[FlatLine]

I saw different scores for the first fight in favor of Pac.. some say he beat Bradley by 9 rounds to 3, 10-2, even 11-1..

But did you have Pacquiao beating Bradley even easier the second time around, was it even less competitive than the first fight or was it a closer fight?

[The Noose]

I thought it was clearer. I believed the first fight had many close rounds.

[Furn]

Score wise they were similar 9-3/8-4 but the rounds where more cleAr this time.

[thuggery]

Rematch was closer, 8-4

First fight was 10-2

[$Bullsfam$]

Much closer. PAC won so easily last time. This time it was a war. Much respect!

[champion4ever]

In my opinion and I know that many may disagree with me but the answer to your question is yes. Bradley simply didn't throw nearly enough punches to justify a victory in this fight as was in the case in their first fight. Pac had beaten him to the punch in almost every exchange in this fight.

[Nagabilly]

First I scored 9-3 for Pac, yesterday it was 7-5 for Pac.

Pac won but it was the kind of fight that I would've thought Bradley won if I didn't score it because Bradley's rounds were clearer. Still, it's pretty impressive that IMO the worst version of Pac ever managed to beat a young top 3 P4P.

[Simurgh]

Manny was strategically totally unprepared for Bradley's tactics. It's obvious it took him half of the fight to get used to it. Bradley never really fought that kind of the fight before. Once manny got it he dominated the fight.

I think he would look even better if Roach prepared him for aggressive Bradley. One thing is for sure. Manny is not done! He is still the force to be reckoned with

[Earl-Hickey]

Much closer. PAC won so easily last time. This time it was a war. Much respect!

Lol that was no war.

[bojangles1987]

I thought it was much closer and Bradley did better. He was completely outfighting Pacquiao early, thought that backfired.