Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Has Floyd BEATEN Anybody As GOOD AS TIM BRADLEY???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
    WTF,, in what universe was bradley #2 p4p,, i agree he was a legit top 5 guy, but he was never ahead of rigo or ward.....

    I dont follow ring rankings, but i cant believe they had tim #2,,, Who had tim #2
    I dont think hes P4P #2 im just saying that People where so hyped up on Bradley. Me personally i would have Floyd,Rigo,Lara,Ward, even Canelo ahead in Bradley in terms of skill level. I always thought people made Bradley more than what he was.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by turkas View Post
      LOL p4p #2? Yikes...
      Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
      WTF,, in what universe was bradley #2 p4p,, i agree he was a legit top 5 guy, but he was never ahead of rigo or ward.....

      I dont follow ring rankings, but i cant believe they had tim #2,,, Who had tim #2
      Originally posted by turkas View Post
      Die hard Pacquiao fans, that would be it.
      bradley was listed p4p #3 just behind floyd and ward in ring rankings. the poster probably didnt think much of ward's recent actions and put him #2.

      lmfaaoo you floyd fans are so salty at this thread that you are nitpicking 1 slot placements of an opinion ranking:

      http://******.craveonline.com/ratings/pound-for-pound

      Comment


      • Originally posted by RetroSpeed05 View Post
        I dont think hes P4P #2 im just saying that People where so hyped up on Bradley. Me personally i would have Floyd,Rigo,Lara,Ward, even Canelo ahead in Bradley in terms of skill level. I always thought people made Bradley more than what he was.
        The reason why Bradley was ranked #3 in the first place was because he defeated Marquez. Marquez was only there because he defeated Manny. So its a triangle thing going on here. I always thought Bradly was a good boxer but nothing close to "elite".

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Ragnar Lothbrok View Post
          bradley was listed p4p #3 just behind floyd and ward in ring rankings. the poster probably didnt think much of ward's recent actions and put him #2.

          lmfaaoo you floyd fans are so salty at this thread that you are nitpicking 1 slot placements of an opinion ranking:

          http://******.craveonline.com/ratings/pound-for-pound

          trust me dude, Im no floyd fanboy,, i am critical of him alot of times,,, but i also gotta defend him if there is nonsense being said that he doesnt have a win as good as bradley,, thats just nonsense,, he has plenty of wins equal to that

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Ragnar Lothbrok View Post
            P4P Top 10 (legitimate unlike canelo and guerrero's golden boy promotions forced ranking) slick, undefeated (officially) young, in his prime, has floyd ever faced anybody as good as time bradley?

            Corrales maybe? Castillo?

            What do you say?
            tim's lost 3 of his last 4 fights, and hasn't beaten any legit ww's.


            dude's trash. get over it.


            had pacquiao been given the decision the first time they fought, you wouldn't even be posting on the topic.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Toyman View Post
              Dont think so. Not sure if floyd has ever beaten a top 5 p4p fighter ever in his career. he's only ever fought p4p fighters once they were clearly over the hill.


              floyd's best win would probablly only qualify as manny's 3rd/4th best win.
              Hi little kid

              Alvarez was #9 p4p when they fought
              Mosley was #3 p4p when they fought
              Marquez was #2 p4p for Floyd's tuneup fight
              Hatton was #8 p4p when they fought
              Corrales was #5 p4p when they fought

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Zano-24 View Post
                The reason why Bradley was ranked #3 in the first place was because he defeated Marquez. Marquez was only there because he defeated Manny. So its a triangle thing going on here. I always thought Bradly was a good boxer but nothing close to "elite".
                what you just did there could be done for any fighter.

                bradley was ranked #3 by ring magazine behind floyd and ward.

                you people acted like that poster did something so egregious as replacing the #2 fighter with the #3 one.

                so much floyd fan butt hurt in this thread.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Zano-24 View Post
                  The reason why Bradley was ranked #3 in the first place was because he defeated Marquez. Marquez was only there because he defeated Manny. So its a triangle thing going on here. I always thought Bradly was a good boxer but nothing close to "elite".
                  this. he's not elite.



                  // thread.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Ragnar Lothbrok View Post
                    what you just did there could be done for any fighter.

                    bradley was ranked #3 by ring magazine behind floyd and ward.

                    you people acted like that poster did something so egregious as replacing the #2 fighter with the #3 one.

                    so much floyd fan butt hurt in this thread.
                    The only butthurt person person I see on this thread posting like a mad man is you.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by FLY TY View Post
                      this. he's not elite.



                      // thread.
                      Ring Magazine begs to differ.

                      thread continues.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP