Comments Thread For: Bradley-Pacquiao Rematch: Pre-Fight Report Card

[FLY TY]

Bradley has far more intangibles than Pacman. He's far more versatile. He can fight from any distance, has shown the ability to change the gameplan and is rather durable albeit chinny.

Pacman fights one way and one way alone. Plus he hasn't shown the stamina, nor exploding power that made him dat guy. I expect Bradley to put on a performance similar to Pacman/Marquez 3, except Bradley will win ever more clearly than even JMM did dat night.

Based on what? Bradley did nothing in the first fight to warrant as much backing as he's getting for this one. This fight won't be close either, and he might get stopped this time. I don't get for the life of me how a dude that gets whitewashed the first time, actually gets picked to win the second fight. He's not fighting Marquez or ruslan guys, it's the same dude that beat him 10-2 before, and nothing I've seen from him since, changes anything. I just don't get it.

[Boxing Goat]

This guy is a joke and forever will be. The 11-6 prediction record is further proof of that. His articles are swayed by his personal opinion and agenda.

There's no place for that in true journalism chief.

[Boxing Goat]

If Pacquiao is an A- in speed.... who's an A+?

I know huh, the guy would have probably given prime Roy Jones an A- too.

[Boxing Goat]

Bradley has far more intangibles than Pacman. He's far more versatile. He can fight from any distance, has shown the ability to change the gameplan and is rather durable albeit chinny.

Pacman fights one way and one way alone. Plus he hasn't shown the stamina, nor exploding power that made him dat guy. I expect Bradley to put on a performance similar to Pacman/Marquez 3, except Bradley will win ever more clearly than even JMM did dat night.

The first fight proved that Pacquiao was way more equipped to deal with what Bradley brought to the table and not the other way around.

Manny may be a speedy power puncher first, but he is also very smart and adapts in the ring as well. It's been proven in this argument directly and indirectly.

[Bushbaby]

Based on what? Bradley did nothing in the first fight to warrant as much backing as he's getting for this one. This fight won't be close either, and he might get stopped this time. I don't get for the life of me how a dude that gets whitewashed the first time, actually gets picked to win the second fight. He's not fighting Marquez or ruslan guys, it's the same dude that beat him 10-2 before, and nothing I've seen from him since, changes anything. I just don't get it.

I saw a 7-5 fight for Pacman 1st time. Add to that the fact that Bradley fought 2/3rds of the fight crippled tells me all I need to know. Pacman most definitely did not dominate the fight. Did he win? Sure, a close competitive fight against an injured fighter.

But the bold, does nothing change your opinion concerning Pacman either since the Bradley fight?? Cause let me tell you, there's one glaring thing that happened since then.

[Bushbaby]

The first fight proved that Pacquiao was way more equipped to deal with what Bradley brought to the table and not the other way around.

Manny may be a speedy power puncher first, but he is also very smart and adapts in the ring as well. It's been proven in this argument directly and indirectly.

No the only thing the 1st fight proved is that an injured Bradley went 12 competitive rounds with Pacman. That's all that proved.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by FLY TY

Based on what? Bradley did nothing in the first fight to warrant as much backing as he's getting for this one. This fight won't be close either, and he might get stopped this time. I don't get for the life of me how a dude that gets whitewashed the first time, actually gets picked to win the second fight. He's not fighting Marquez or ruslan guys, it's the same dude that beat him 10-2 before, and nothing I've seen from him since, changes anything. I just don't get it.

I saw a 7-5 fight for Pacman 1st time. Add to that the fact that Bradley fought 2/3rds of the fight crippled tells me all I need to know. Pacman most definitely did not dominate the fight. Did he win? Sure, a close competitive fight against an injured fighter.

But the bold, does nothing change your opinion concerning Pacman either since the Bradley fight?? Cause let me tell you, there's one glaring thing that happened since then.

And Bradley is gonna exploit that right? Cause he hits soooooooooooooooooooo hard... -_-


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[the mesiah]

If Pacquiao is an A- in speed.... who's an A+?

The only one that comes to my head quick is Gamboa but it seems like it has been years since he has fought.

[Bushbaby]

And Bradley is gonna exploit that right? Cause he hits soooooooooooooooooooo hard... -_-


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

Didn't say nor or imply that. Simply saying that is more detrimental than anything Bradley went through since.

[Boxing Goat]

No the only thing the 1st fight proved is that an injured Bradley went 12 competitive rounds with Pacman. That's all that proved.

Ha ha ha.

Losing at least 9 out of 12 rounds after being injured around round 3 while evading another fighter is not all that competitive in this universe.