Pacquiao is P4p after this fight?

[Sugar Adam Ali]

base on ur logic lad is p4p number one coz he will crush floyd in any fantasy fight

No, thats not what he is saying,,,

He is saying that if wlad was a welter, and fought floyd, or vice versa, that floyd would beat wlad,,, If wlad was at the lower weights, he would be like kelly pavlik,, long jab, big power but gets carved up by movers and counters

[DoubleLeftH00k]

No, thats not what he is saying,,,

He is saying that if wlad was a welter, and fought floyd, or vice versa, that floyd would beat wlad,,, If wlad was at the lower weights, he would be like kelly pavlik,, long jab, big power but gets carved up by movers and counters

lad is a welter? since when did p4p start becoming base on fantasy fights?

what u smoking?

[megadeth]

lad is a welter? since when did p4p start becoming base on fantasy fights?

what u smoking?

This is exactly the original meaning of Pound 4 Pound. Don't believe it? Look it up!

[Sugar Adam Ali]

lad is a welter? since when did p4p start becoming base on fantasy fights?

what u smoking?

obviously you dont understand how p4p works,,,, wlad and floyd would never fight, but p4p Floyd is a much better all around fighter than wlad. Wlad's skillset wouldnt translate very well in the lower divisions, and guys like floyd or rigo would be dominant at heavy

[mikinoki]

3rd at best. Losing two of your last four fights and beating Brandon Rios doesn't make you P4P king. The only thing pac is p4p #1 is delusional fans.

The only delusional guy are you if you think he lost to Bradley....

[megadeth]

obviously you dont understand how p4p works,,,, wlad and floyd would never fight, but p4p Floyd is a much better all around fighter than wlad. Wlad's skillset wouldnt translate very well in the lower divisions, and guys like floyd or rigo would be dominant at heavy

Makes ya wonder how many of the people that talk about P4P don't know the true meaning of it.

[_original_]

Makes ya wonder how many of the people that talk about P4P don't know the true meaning of it.

Not saying you're entirely wrong, but there isn't really a true meaning to P4P because it's subjective and open to one's personal interpretation. Yes, the way you're describing it as is one very popular criteria that makes sense, but it's not the best "one-way" criteria everybody should use. For instance, it's flawed in the sense that it neglects resume and intangibles. We can't just go by assumed betting odds or how we think fights are going to play out in our head because we need more concrete evidence such as notable victories and important accomplishments to construct our lists as well.

[Pacquiao'd]

now if bradley beats pac for real tonight?

bradley:
pac p4p top 5
marquez p4p top 3 coz he beat ko pac
provo a beast

now can floyd beat that list?

should be no 1 if he beats pac

yall try really hard dont yall?

Pac - KO by marquez and went on to fight bum bum
Marquez - schooled by floyd many years ago
Provo - bradley went life and death with this punching bag

[$tate of Mind]

It depends on how he wins. If it's a clear cut victory, I would have no problem with anybody who would want to place him at number 3. There is no way in hell that he's on the level of Mayweather or Ward. He's still just one fight removed from being face planted by a guy he was supposed to beat. Beating Brandon Rios is not a ringing endorsement for anything.

[DeadLikeMe]

The only delusional guy are you if you think he lost to Bradley....

He either lost to JMM twice or lost to Bradley and JMM any way you look at it.