Pac's legacy before the Oscar fight was better than Floyd's ever could be. You don't get credit for retiring twice when 147 was hot
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Roach Backs Pacquiao Over Mayweather in Legacy
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by MurkaMan View PostNumber 1, every fighter has a legacy for their own reasons. Pac may have fought a bunch of unimportant opponents at the higher weights, but at the same time he still climbed those weight classes. Number 2, why is Roach lying about Floyd being Boring? LOL Some people lie about that because they need to think of some way to speak around the fact that he is so stunningly, historically skilled.
Floyd fights nothing like Ward. Floyd is not a ****er, but he is one of those magicians where you say, "Where the FK did this dude come from? What planet is this guy from?" These are the things you say when Floyd fights. His fight with Ghost was boring af. He ran around the ring and threw 3 slow right hands a round. People booed. His fight with Canelo was VERY exciting, he stood in the pocket and WALKED him down.
Pac fought Rios, and although he throws more shots than Floyd, HE is the one moving around, using all this footwork on RIOS LOL. Floyd will stand flatfooted and walk you down. When Floyd fought JMM, he wasnt aggressive as he was against Canelo who was bigger and stronger. But against JMM, he was so magical the audience were going "Oooh, Ahhh!"
Never in the history of boxing will you see a fighter so SKILLED, that even without aggression he can entertain the audience and have them gasping as if they were watching a Copperfield show.
One thing I want to say is, Marcos is WAAAY smaller than Canelo. Marcos is not strong or powerful enough for Floyd. Floyd will not move at ALL vs Marcos. Floyd is going to beat him up even WORSE than Canelo. So why is Roach LYING about Floyd being boring? LOL I dont fall for the games.
He wants to bait you into a "boxer vs brawler" debate. I dont fall for that trash. Its a trick. When Floyd fights, we ALL are watching the same thing. We ALL are seeing something so CRAZY it doesnt even make sense that a person should even be able to do it. Its not a matter of "In MY opinion he's entertaining, and in YOUR opinion he's not" GTFO.
Me, YOU, BOTH have NEVER seen a fighter this sharp. He will stand in front of you and do MAGIC tricks. Change his entire style and dominate 45 different opponents without even being HISSED. Best fighter I have ever seen.
Fook off.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Renal Colic View PostYou're the same dude who doesn't want Lara to fight Canelo because you know he'll beat him and the demand for a Lara-Mayweather fight will be deafening. You want Lara to sit alongside Margarito, Williams, Pacquiao, and Martinez in the quarantine room.
Fook off.
Why are you PRETENDING? Cheap Troll-tactics gone wrong.
Comment
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by MurkaMan View PostI didnt say any of that stuff. I actually prioritized Lara vs Floyd before Lara vs Canelo. And I never said I didnt want Lara to fight Canelo. You KNOW what I said, so why did you write this comment PRETENDING like you DONT know what I said?
You said Mayweather doesn't know who Lara is and that he has to beat Smith to come to Floyd's attention. I don't believe anyone, yourself included, actually believes that Floyd doesn't know who Lara is. It's simply not believable.
Why, then, would you claim this? Because you realise that people would demand a Lara-Mayweather fight if Lara beats Canelo. By contrast, no one is going to care if he beats Smith. That hardly raises his stock at all.
Comment
Comment