Canelo vs. Lara: Post Fight Discussion Thread

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

is this the first time u.s fans gonna see one of the three Kameda's brothers? they all gonna get their's money worth, kameda's brothers are very entertaining to watch.

I think this is the first time one of them is on American TV. On a major network/event anyway.

[Bardock]

So you're gonna take Boxrec's word over the WBA and BoxingScene?

Doesnt matter what belts he fought for cause going by your logic, he was just a paper champ. Plus Floyd was #1 @ 154 so Canelo and Trout had no business fighting for the RING belt.

Lol you're mad again? How is may #1 when he hasn't even fought at 154 since de la hoya lol whoever wins this fight is #1 at 154 belt or no belt

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Lol you're mad again? How is may #1 when he hasn't even fought at 154 since de la hoya lol whoever wins this fight is #1 at 154 belt or no belt

What am I supposed to be mad about? Wtf are you talking about? I said Mayweather WAS the #1 guy at 154. You should really get your facts right, Mayweather fought Cotto at 154. He fought Canelo at 154. Anything about 147 is considered 154. He became #1 for beating Cotto. Which was more than what Canelo had done.

Just stop dude. You didnt even know Mayweather fought Cotto at 154.

[Bardock]

What am I supposed to be mad about? Wtf are you talking about? I said Mayweather WAS the #1 guy at 154. You should really get your facts right, Mayweather fought Cotto at 154. He fought Canelo at 154. Anything about 147 is considered 154. He became #1 for beating Cotto. Which was more than what Canelo had done.

Just stop dude. You didnt even know Mayweather fought Cotto at 154.

Lol oh I forgot bout cotto but that was a weak version of cotto but what I meant is he fought him at a catchweight and regardless if he did beat cotto, so did trout and he became lineal champ by beating trout so may was never the man at 154 that's my point. He is now because of that coward catchweight but you get me either way do you agree if canelo wins this fight he's #1 at JMW or are you full of shiet like always and are going to say may is #1 if Blahra doesn't win

[Bardock]

Lara is going to run like the beach he is. ****ing coward.

Canelo will track him down though and I am confident he stops Lara around the 8th.

Lol yupp this guy will be in an invisible tricycle all night

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Lol oh I forgot bout cotto but that was a weak version of cotto but what I meant is he fought him at a catchweight and regardless if he did beat cotto, so did trout and he became lineal champ by beating trout so may was never the man at 154 that's my point. He is now because of that coward catchweight but you get me either way do you agree if canelo wins this fight he's #1 at JMW or are you full of shiet like always and are going to say may is #1 if Blahra doesn't win

The Cotto fight wasnt at a catchweight. And the Canelo fight, catchweight or not, it was a JMW fight. Only reason the Trout fight was for the RING belt was cause we know who owns the RING. So again, by your logic Canelo was a paper champ.

And I never said the winner of this fight wouldn't be #1.

[Bardock]

The Cotto fight wasnt at a catchweight. And the Canelo fight, catchweight or not, it was a JMW fight. Only reason the Trout fight was for the RING belt was cause we know who owns the RING. So again, by your logic Canelo was a paper champ.

And I never said the winner of this fight wouldn't be #1.

I NEVER SAID COTTO WAS A CATCH WEIGHT SCUM. and really? it had nothing to do with the fact #1 and #2 were fighting each other and were unifying the titles? lol you're fckng ******. The same shiet all you haters were saying about trout you say about lara but now hes fighting him just like he fought trout. YOU LITERALLY CANT BECOME LINEAL CHAMP WITHOUT BEATING THE MAN. are you this ******, seriously? Or are you that much of a hater? cuz if you're that ****** ill stop picking on you I dont feel right about bullying ******s

[-PBP-]

Canelo was never lineal champ at 154. Ring isn't the same as lineal.

Floyd won the lineage from beating Canelo which was the #1 vs. the #2 in the division. These were the rankings before Floyd vs. Canelo.

http://www.tbrb.org/2013/08/20/13-august-2013/

[Bardock]

Canelo was never lineal champ at 154. Ring isn't the same as lineal.

Floyd won the lineage from beating Canelo which was the #1 vs. the #2 in the division. These were the rankings before Floyd vs. Canelo.

http://www.tbrb.org/2013/08/20/13-august-2013/

you sure? why is there so much confusion with this ****? This is why there should only be one title. Either way Canelo was obviously the best, #1 vs #2 if him and may were fighting for the lineal title. Lara was never the best at 154 thats my point and he never will be

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Lol oh I forgot bout cotto but that was a weak version of cotto but what I meant is he fought him at a catchweight

Then you need to work on your English/grammar.

I NEVER SAID COTTO WAS A CATCH WEIGHT SCUM. and really? it had nothing to do with the fact #1 and #2 were fighting each other and were unifying the titles? lol you're fckng ******. The same shiet all you haters were saying about trout you say about lara but now hes fighting him just like he fought trout. YOU LITERALLY CANT BECOME LINEAL CHAMP WITHOUT BEATING THE MAN. are you this ******, seriously? Or are you that much of a hater? cuz if you're that ****** ill stop picking on you I dont feel right about bullying ******s

You have LITERALLY lost every argument in here with me then resort to name calling. And Im supposed to be the one that's mad. No you're not trolling. You're dead serious and have no ****ing clue what you're talking about, literally.

Trout vs Canelo wasnt #1 vs #2, dummy. It was #2 vs #3. But Im the ****** one.