Sauerland wants Hopkins for Brähmer.

[Jewish-Reptile]

The WBA rules state the super champion has 18 months to face the regular title holder from the date the regular champ acquired the belt,if the regular belt changes hands between another challenger the original date is still the date the super champ has to defend by still.

Braehmer will get a mandatory shot at Shumenov or Hopkins,presuming he holds onto his regular title.i believe the WBA would only allow delays with unifications.with Froch facing Kessler last year,the IBF were reluctant to allow unification because Mikkel didn't actually hold the full title,only regular belt.this in itself creates a nonsensical standpoint with the WBA regular belt not actually considered a world title !

I understand the sanctioning bodies giving out these lesser belts,my view on them all is obviosuly quite low,as is pretty much everyone else's on NSB.it just creates these issues with actually preventing the match ups we wanna see.we struggle to see the top guys facing each other already with Showtime and HBO refusing to accommodate each other.

Where do the WBC stand in regards to unifications ? Can somebody please elaborate ? I was thinking maybe the new WBC heavyweight champion may elect to unify rather than go through with his ordered mandatories against Wilder and Jennings/Perez winner.

[jas]

The WBA rules state the super champion has 18 months to face the regular title holder from the date the regular champ acquired the belt,if the regular belt changes hands between another challenger the original date is still the date the super champ has to defend by still.

Braehmer will get a mandatory shot at Shumenov or Hopkins,presuming he holds onto his regular title.i believe the WBA would only allow delays with unifications.with Froch facing Kessler last year,the IBF were reluctant to allow unification because Mikkel didn't actually hold the full title,only regular belt.this in itself creates a nonsensical standpoint with the WBA regular belt not actually considered a world title !

I understand the sanctioning bodies giving out these lesser belts,my view on them all is obviosuly quite low,as is pretty much everyone else's on NSB.it just creates these issues with actually preventing the match ups we wanna see.we struggle to see the top guys facing each other already with Showtime and HBO refusing to accommodate each other.

Where do the WBC stand in regards to unifications ? Can somebody please elaborate ? I was thinking maybe the new WBC heavyweight champion may elect to unify rather than go through with his ordered mandatories against Wilder and Jennings/Perez winner.

Bernard Hopkins is 49 years and 4 months old. He is not going to go Germany to fight, especially against a hypejob paper champ fraud.

I thought that would be the end of this discussion but people seem to think sanctioning bodies are not corrupt and who bend their rules whenever they want. So carry on and waste energy on believing braehmar will ever fight Hopkins. You got a better chance of Ali raymi losing a fight.


And In regards to WBC heavyweight. WBC don't officially allow unifications but look at Danny Garcia. It depends on who wins the belt . Wlads goal is to unify all the titles to become undisputed and then retire and he will do it . There's chance the WBC champ ducks him but I imagine money will be too much for that to happen .