Comments Thread For: Shaw Furious: Curtis Stevens is a Fraud if No Rematch!

[US Dirk Killer]

You're kinda missing the point but you always do. Carry on.

Yea, so do you so no problem

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Yea, so do you so no problem

I'm the one that made the point dummy

I've never denied British refs are ****. The point is that Americans like to pretend all of theirs are fair and impartial when we saw two glaring examples last night in back-to-back fights that they're not.

Following? So you saying "herp de derp Brit refs suck" doesn't exactly count as a clever retort.

[JFalu]

I'm the one that made the point dummy

I've never denied British refs are ****. The point is that Americans like to pretend all of theirs are fair and impartial when we saw two glaring examples last night in back-to-back fights that they're not.

Following? So you saying "herp de derp Brit refs suck" doesn't exactly count as a clever retort.

alright already...

[Light_Speed]

Johnson deserves a rematch because he was winning but he fought a ****** fight, that's the price you pay. He gave Stevens countless opportunities to land the left hook flush. You do this against a big puncher and you're asking to get KO'd at any time in the fight. The stoppage wasn't bad, Johnson looked out on his feet, maybe the ref should have let Stevens land a couple more big shots to leave no doubt, but Johnson looked bad.

[Hougigo]

“@TheFightSource: @Showtime_curtis So no Johnson rematch?”MONEY GOTTA BE RIGHT

— Curtis Stevens (@Showtime_curtis) April 5, 2014