Ring Magazines Top 100 Greatest Punchers of All time

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The_One77
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 1207
    • 101
    • 1
    • 1,716

    #11
    Ring Mag are horribly biased, they love the old fighters from like 100 years ago.

    Comment

    • JuicyJuice
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2006
      • 3493
      • 111
      • 4
      • 3,913

      #12
      Originally posted by borikua
      Nope, Benn is the better puncher of the two...I just assume that you must be mad as hell cuz Ring Mag put RJJ ahead of Benn..
      **** The Ring. KO Magazine was better.

      Comment

      • medium-deek
        Bet to Win
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2005
        • 5693
        • 517
        • 1,271
        • 14,752

        #13
        Originally posted by The_One77
        Ring Mag are horribly biased, they love the old fighters from like 100 years ago.
        LOL. Very true.

        Comment

        • The_One77
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2005
          • 1207
          • 101
          • 1
          • 1,716

          #14
          Originally posted by medium-deek
          LOL. Very true.

          nice one mate, i also used to live in Lambeth.

          Comment

          • medium-deek
            Bet to Win
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2005
            • 5693
            • 517
            • 1,271
            • 14,752

            #15
            Originally posted by The_One77
            nice one mate, i also used to live in Lambeth.
            Were abouts in Lambeth?

            Comment

            • cple
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Nov 2003
              • 920
              • 40
              • 0
              • 7,160

              #16
              This list is attempted to rank the best punchers of all-time, not the hardest. That's why Joe Louis is ahead of Foreman. Yes, Foreman probably did hit harder than Joe Louis, but that's pretty much it. He was sloppy, wild, and slow. There's more to punching than power. Like i have stated many times, punching is a mixture of power, handspeed, technique, precision, accuracy, and ability to put punches into combinations. I think the Ring got #1 right. No one excelled in all of those categories as well as Joe Louis.

              Aaron Pryor was an accumilation puncher, rarely stopping an opponent with one punch.

              And this list isn't who is the better fighter, it's who is the better puncher. I believe in that issue of the ring, before the list, he clearly states this point. He uses the example of Carlos Monzon and Rodrigo Valdez if i remember correctly. It is obvious that Monzon was the superior fighter, but he didn't punch nearly as hard as Valdez. All of this is stated in the preface.

              Comment

              • The_One77
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2005
                • 1207
                • 101
                • 1
                • 1,716

                #17
                Originally posted by medium-deek
                Were abouts in Lambeth?
                Streatham mate, what about you?

                Comment

                • medium-deek
                  Bet to Win
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 5693
                  • 517
                  • 1,271
                  • 14,752

                  #18
                  Originally posted by The_One77
                  Streatham mate, what about you?
                  I just finished working in streatham, near the Megabowl. I'm in Stockwell.

                  Comment

                  • oldgringo
                    Ellis
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 12747
                    • 968
                    • 453
                    • 30,064

                    #19
                    Originally posted by cple
                    This list is attempted to rank the best punchers of all-time, not the hardest. That's why Joe Louis is ahead of Foreman. Yes, Foreman probably did hit harder than Joe Louis, but that's pretty much it. He was sloppy, wild, and slow. There's more to punching than power. Like i have stated many times, punching is a mixture of power, handspeed, technique, precision, accuracy, and ability to put punches into combinations. I think the Ring got #1 right. No one excelled in all of those categories as well as Joe Louis.

                    Aaron Pryor was an accumilation puncher, rarely stopping an opponent with one punch.

                    And this list isn't who is the better fighter, it's who is the better puncher. I believe in that issue of the ring, before the list, he clearly states this point. He uses the example of Carlos Monzon and Rodrigo Valdez if i remember correctly. It is obvious that Monzon was the superior fighter, but he didn't punch nearly as hard as Valdez. All of this is stated in the preface.

                    Which is why I think Alexis Arguello should be ranked higher. He punched with great technique and precision...very hard and sharp everytime he threw a punch.

                    Comment

                    • The_One77
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2005
                      • 1207
                      • 101
                      • 1
                      • 1,716

                      #20
                      kosta Tyzu was a very effective puncher, he should be much higher

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP