Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: I Won at Least Ten Rounds Against Bradley!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View Post
    Two messed up ankles, still managed to outbox Pacquiao in the championship rounds. There has got to be some type of faggotry to think Pacquiao was actually impressive or even dominated that fight. The biggest controversy here is that people still hang posters of Pacquiao on their wall, probably buy his action figures too
    It's cause he's a global icon. They even say Marquez got a "lucky punch." Go figure, in a sport where your supposed to punch the other guy...

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by APPONO ASTOS View Post
      keep believing that lmao........and my scorecard for that fight was more in line with tom miller.....

      that was a much more closer fight than pac vs bradley.....
      I will keep believing what actually takes place,not some opinions of boxing writers or commentators..No problem..My scorecard was in line with the judges,we just have different rds scored for different fighters..No biggie,it was a close fight,and that's how close fights are scored from time to time...

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
        Um he did legit win..LMAO.Do you not see his rec,does Manny still hold the WBO belt??Then yes he legit won..Oh and the other judge who score the fight for Manny had it 7-5 for Manny..I guess he is a a dumb judge two for seeing a close fight..Oh lord..
        Are you aware that the WBO ordered a review for the fight with a panel of 5 judges, and all 5 scored the fight for Pacquiao? They couldn't overturn the decision because it was a title fight.

        Need I remind you CJ Ross was one of the judges scoring on fight night right?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by DonMega View Post
          It's cause he's a global icon. They even say Marquez got a "lucky punch." Go figure, in a sport where your supposed to punch the other guy...
          Wasn't a fan at the time but once upon a time Whitaker made DLH look ******, had Oscar missing repeatedly and people cheered the shit out of that nonsense, people will come around eventually, most that I've spoken to have. If they can drop the fanboy act they'll start to rationalize.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            I will keep believing what actually takes place,not some opinions of boxing writers or commentators..No problem..My scorecard was in line with the judges,we just have different rds scored for different fighters..No biggie,it was a close fight,and that's how close fights are scored from time to time...
            pac vs bradley wasn't close at all lol......pac vs marquez 1-2 = close fights (could have gone either way).......pac vs bradley = definite clear win for pac

            i hope you'll find the courage to step out of your delusional bubble to understand this one day..take care

            Comment


            • #66
              Pac won 8-4. I could MAYBE see an argument for 7-5, but thats still a little stretch.

              Comment


              • #67
                Would say 8 rounds was about right.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by DonMega View Post
                  It's cause he's a global icon. They even say Marquez got a "lucky punch." Go figure, in a sport where your supposed to punch the other guy...
                  Bradley broke both those ankles, back peddling and escaping from an onslaught of left hands.

                  But hey, Bradley still has that "0"

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View Post
                    Not at all, a reach is actually thinking that it's inconceivable to score it for Bradley. That fight looked to be in the bag for Pacquiao until he gave up the championship rounds. Why didn't Brian Kenny see it as such? He brought up the fact that Bradley's body attack went unappreciated, also said he would be willing to score that fight round by round with anyone and he had it 7-5 Bradley mind you. Would you say he was reaching as well?


                    BIG TIME...it's a reach...even if i gave the swing rounds to Bradley, a draw is as best as it gets

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Beercules View Post
                      Bradley broke both those ankles, back peddling and escaping from an onslaught of left hands.

                      But hey, Bradley still has that "0"
                      Yea, and apparently pac fans take credit for that like it was some sort of offensive strategy. How many times has that happened in boxing? Seems lke a freak injury to me.

                      And to your second statement....WAR BRADLEY!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP