Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: I Won at Least Ten Rounds Against Bradley!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Doctor_Tenma
    Monster
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 33313
    • 1,327
    • 1,249
    • 58,127

    #31
    Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
    that's such a reach, Dom...we both know it
    Not at all, a reach is actually thinking that it's inconceivable to score it for Bradley. That fight looked to be in the bag for Pacquiao until he gave up the championship rounds. Why didn't Brian Kenny see it as such? He brought up the fact that Bradley's body attack went unappreciated, also said he would be willing to score that fight round by round with anyone and he had it 7-5 Bradley mind you. Would you say he was reaching as well?

    Comment

    • Rome-By-Ko
      The winner Is
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 20157
      • 323
      • 332
      • 29,833

      #32
      Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma
      1,2,7,10,11,12

      All scored to Bradley
      I had rds 1-3 for Bradley,rds 9-12 for Bradley..

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #33
        Originally posted by DonMega
        Exacly, I just dont see how people can discredit the first two and act like it was a wash....
        Two messed up ankles, still managed to outbox Pacquiao in the championship rounds. There has got to be some type of faggotry to think Pacquiao was actually impressive or even dominated that fight. The biggest controversy here is that people still hang posters of Pacquiao on their wall, probably buy his action figures too

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #34
          Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma
          Not at all, a reach is actually thinking that it's inconceivable to score it for Bradley. That fight looked to be in the bag for Pacquiao until he gave up the championship rounds. Why didn't Brian Kenny see it as such? He brought up the fact that Bradley's body attack went unappreciated, also said he would be willing to score that fight round by round with anyone and he had it 7-5 Bradley mind you. Would you say he was reaching as well?
          It's not a reach..A lot of close rds..Pac did not do anymore damage then Bradley either..I love the way people try to go for the effective punch argument..Neither was really effective punchers in this fight..Not to mention I would slightly give the edge to Bradley cause he body attack slowed Manny down..

          Comment

          • Jsmooth9876
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2014
            • 12209
            • 2,297
            • 365
            • 72,745

            #35
            Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma
            Not at all, a reach is actually thinking that it's inconceivable to score it for Bradley. That fight looked to be in the bag for Pacquiao until he gave up the championship rounds. Why didn't Brian Kenny see it as such? He brought up the fact that Bradley's body attack went unappreciated, also said he would be willing to score that fight round by round with anyone and he had it 7-5 Bradley mind you. Would you say he was reaching as well?
            Sure, you could bring up B.K., how about the other 60+ people in the business who scored it handily for Manny. On wikipedia there is a list of everyone's scores..I think it was roughly 60-4 in favor of Manny..All those scores were from ringside writers etc...Bradley didn't win this fight. Bradley vs Marquez was 100% closer fight.

            Comment

            • Doctor_Tenma
              Monster
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 33313
              • 1,327
              • 1,249
              • 58,127

              #36
              Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
              I had rds 1-3 for Bradley,rds 9-12 for Bradley..
              Round 9 was the most exciting round of that fight, both went back and forth, I favored Pacquiao's work in that round more but a judge could have definitely seen it differently from ringside, if people can't see that then they can't be helped.

              Comment

              • Bermuda
                potential friend
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 5108
                • 240
                • 13
                • 11,493

                #37
                Originally posted by Jsmooth9876
                Sure, you could bring up B.K., how about the other 60+ people in the business who scored it handily for Manny. On wikipedia there is a list of everyone's scores..I think it was roughly 60-4 in favor of Manny..All those scores were from ringside writers etc...Bradley didn't win this fight. Bradley vs Marquez was 100% closer fight.
                bu...bu..but...brian kenny doe......lmao

                Comment

                • Bermuda
                  potential friend
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 5108
                  • 240
                  • 13
                  • 11,493

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                  I had rds 1-3 for Bradley,rds 9-12 for Bradley..
                  so you had bradley winning..so basically you're judging is on par with ****ing cj ross....just let that sink in for a minute lmao.........

                  Comment

                  • Doctor_Tenma
                    Monster
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 33313
                    • 1,327
                    • 1,249
                    • 58,127

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Jsmooth9876
                    Sure, you could bring up B.K., how about the other 60+ people in the business who scored it handily for Manny. On wikipedia there is a list of everyone's scores..I think it was roughly 60-4 in favor of Manny..All those scores were from ringside writers etc...Bradley didn't win this fight. Bradley vs Marquez was 100% closer fight.
                    I wouldn't argue against them, just as well as I wouldn't argue against those who had it for Bradley. People generally find more substance in what Pacquiao brings, that's not even debatable but the fact of the matter is Pacquiao didn't bring any more than Bradley. Fighting in spurts, taking breaks and missing wildly is anything but impressive. Pacquiao knows this himself, I'm sure he laughs thinking he sold it to the lot of you but he knows what he's in for and the seriousness of his training camp shows it.

                    Comment

                    • Matisyahu
                      Contender
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 233
                      • 10
                      • 13
                      • 6,319

                      #40
                      Bradley claims to have won 8 rounds then I have no problem with Pac claiming 10. The TRUTH is somewhere in between.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP