Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: I Won at Least Ten Rounds Against Bradley!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post
    that's such a reach, Dom...we both know it
    Not at all, a reach is actually thinking that it's inconceivable to score it for Bradley. That fight looked to be in the bag for Pacquiao until he gave up the championship rounds. Why didn't Brian Kenny see it as such? He brought up the fact that Bradley's body attack went unappreciated, also said he would be willing to score that fight round by round with anyone and he had it 7-5 Bradley mind you. Would you say he was reaching as well?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View Post
      1,2,7,10,11,12

      All scored to Bradley
      I had rds 1-3 for Bradley,rds 9-12 for Bradley..

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by DonMega View Post
        Exacly, I just dont see how people can discredit the first two and act like it was a wash....
        Two messed up ankles, still managed to outbox Pacquiao in the championship rounds. There has got to be some type of faggotry to think Pacquiao was actually impressive or even dominated that fight. The biggest controversy here is that people still hang posters of Pacquiao on their wall, probably buy his action figures too

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View Post
          Not at all, a reach is actually thinking that it's inconceivable to score it for Bradley. That fight looked to be in the bag for Pacquiao until he gave up the championship rounds. Why didn't Brian Kenny see it as such? He brought up the fact that Bradley's body attack went unappreciated, also said he would be willing to score that fight round by round with anyone and he had it 7-5 Bradley mind you. Would you say he was reaching as well?
          It's not a reach..A lot of close rds..Pac did not do anymore damage then Bradley either..I love the way people try to go for the effective punch argument..Neither was really effective punchers in this fight..Not to mention I would slightly give the edge to Bradley cause he body attack slowed Manny down..

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View Post
            Not at all, a reach is actually thinking that it's inconceivable to score it for Bradley. That fight looked to be in the bag for Pacquiao until he gave up the championship rounds. Why didn't Brian Kenny see it as such? He brought up the fact that Bradley's body attack went unappreciated, also said he would be willing to score that fight round by round with anyone and he had it 7-5 Bradley mind you. Would you say he was reaching as well?
            Sure, you could bring up B.K., how about the other 60+ people in the business who scored it handily for Manny. On wikipedia there is a list of everyone's scores..I think it was roughly 60-4 in favor of Manny..All those scores were from ringside writers etc...Bradley didn't win this fight. Bradley vs Marquez was 100% closer fight.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
              I had rds 1-3 for Bradley,rds 9-12 for Bradley..
              Round 9 was the most exciting round of that fight, both went back and forth, I favored Pacquiao's work in that round more but a judge could have definitely seen it differently from ringside, if people can't see that then they can't be helped.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Jsmooth9876 View Post
                Sure, you could bring up B.K., how about the other 60+ people in the business who scored it handily for Manny. On wikipedia there is a list of everyone's scores..I think it was roughly 60-4 in favor of Manny..All those scores were from ringside writers etc...Bradley didn't win this fight. Bradley vs Marquez was 100% closer fight.
                bu...bu..but...brian kenny doe......lmao

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                  I had rds 1-3 for Bradley,rds 9-12 for Bradley..
                  so you had bradley winning..so basically you're judging is on par with ****ing cj ross....just let that sink in for a minute lmao.........

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Jsmooth9876 View Post
                    Sure, you could bring up B.K., how about the other 60+ people in the business who scored it handily for Manny. On wikipedia there is a list of everyone's scores..I think it was roughly 60-4 in favor of Manny..All those scores were from ringside writers etc...Bradley didn't win this fight. Bradley vs Marquez was 100% closer fight.
                    I wouldn't argue against them, just as well as I wouldn't argue against those who had it for Bradley. People generally find more substance in what Pacquiao brings, that's not even debatable but the fact of the matter is Pacquiao didn't bring any more than Bradley. Fighting in spurts, taking breaks and missing wildly is anything but impressive. Pacquiao knows this himself, I'm sure he laughs thinking he sold it to the lot of you but he knows what he's in for and the seriousness of his training camp shows it.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Bradley claims to have won 8 rounds then I have no problem with Pac claiming 10. The TRUTH is somewhere in between.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP