Didn't realize Tim Bradley's resume was this deep.

[Boxing Goat]

Oh no question. Atleast in my mind.

Definitely a good win.

Then shut up about one of the fights that you think he lost that went on record as a convincing win. You must have lost a bet on that fight or something.

[IronDanHamza]

Me+judges>you

Again, the judges scorecards are a joke.

So using them is as silly as your original point that Alexander won the fight convincingly.

Which is just so far from what actually happened.

[Boxing Goat]

Again, the judges scorecards are a joke.

So using them is as silly as your original point that Alexander won the fight convincingly.

Which is just so far from what actually happened.

Lol, if that's all you got I'm done with you.

Hard headed at all? Lol @ u

[IronDanHamza]

Then shut up about one of the fights that you think he lost that went on record as a convincing win. You must have lost a bet on that fight or something.

Shut up? Why? Just because I think it's a good win for Bradley doesn't mean I'm going to pretend he didn't get a robbery decision against Kotelnik.

"On record" yeah. I see you like "on record" things like Alexander "knocking out" Witter and Alexander "convincingly beat Kotelnik. Because Boxrec says so!

Coincidentally, I actually bet on Alexander to win and was gifted myself.

[-PBP-]

One of the best resumes in boxing, bar none, not even including the Pac "win".

But on April 12th he will have an opportunity to correct that wrong and solidify himself as one of the 3 best fighters in the sport.

[IronDanHamza]

Lol, if that's all you got I'm done with you.

Hard headed at all? Lol @ u

What are you talking about?

You're saying he won convincingly and using the terrible scorecards to support that ******ed view.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I believe that's why the goat is arguing this point..Cause of Bradley num 1 fan(dirk)he thinks your trying to discredit Alexander..I thought it was clear as day that Kotelnik beat Alexander..To be fair tho,there was a heated debate the night of the fight about who won that fight..I know cause I was speaking for Kotelnik that night..

At the end of the day,Alexander has gotten a few favorable decision,he's also has some solid wins..I don't even know where he goes after losing to Porter..

Nowhere because he was never that good.

The fact that he was coming off a frankly embarrassing performance against Kotelnik before he fought Bradley diminishes the win.

The fact that Bradley couldn't beat him as convincingly or impressively as Kotelnik did also diminishes the win. And Kotelnik is a pretty run of the mill fighter himself.

None of this screams "impressive" to me.

[Boxing Goat]

Shut up? Why? Just because I think it's a good win for Bradley doesn't mean I'm going to pretend he didn't get a robbery decision against Kotelnik.

"On record" yeah. I see you like "on record" things like Alexander "knocking out" Witter and Alexander "convincingly beat Kotelnik. Because Boxrec says so!

Coincidentally, I actually bet on Alexander to win and was gifted myself.

You're so full of **** I don't know where to begin. Stop trying to rewrite boxing history to justify your opinion.

[Boxing Goat]

Nowhere because he was never that good.

The fact that he was coming off a frankly embarrassing performance against Kotelnik before he fought Bradley diminishes the win.

The fact that Bradley couldn't beat him as convincingly or impressively as Kotelnik did also diminishes the win. And Kotelnik is a pretty run of the mill fighter himself.

None of this screams "impressive" to me.

You couldn't be more wrong. A win over any version of Alexander at any point is a good one. Stop making yourself look so ignorant.

[IronDanHamza]

You're so full of **** I don't know where to begin. Stop trying to rewrite boxing history to justify your opinion.

You're the one that's trying to re-write what happened

"Alexander knocked out Witter"

"Alexander convincingly beat Kotelnik"

That's re-writing history to a tee.

But I suppose it's ok because that's what it says on Boxrec so that must be the case