Tweet
First off the decision he got against Castillo which in a lot of peoples mind was a unfair decision which Mayweather got due to the fact he was probably seen as the prospect and the guy who now is gathering the masses and bring a lot of attention into boxing.
In his first fight with Castillo he (Floyd) was out-hustled, he wasn't landing enough shots to steal rounds and the fact that Castillo was the lightweight champion and he was fighting more like the challenger who wanted it more It kind of makes you wonder.
We've seen this happen with other previous fighters who have been hand-fed the same silver spoon treatment Mayweather had and getting the benefit of the doubt AKA Adrien Broner, albeit Broner is not anywhere near the level Mayweather is and Maywether is a genuinely very talented fighter.
Broner has had several fights (Quintero, PDL, Malinaggi) people had him losing but he managed to pull off a decision.
Right that was just the first loss I was talking about the second one comes in at when Mayweather fought Zab Judah...
00:15 seconds into the fight Mayweather gets a nice shot to his nuts and Roger Mayweather steps into the ring and at that point the fight by the rules SHOULD of been a DQ thus resulting in a victory for Zab.
Skip to 10:50
When James Kirkland fought Carlos Molina, Kirkland knocks Molina down in the 10th round and Molinas corner come into the ring and the fight is called off as a DQ and Kirkland is the winner.
What is the difference between that and what Roger did?
Roger did considerably worse as he needed police to take him out of the ring, I think my opinion its a biased agenda to protect Mayweathers 0 as they realized they need this cash cow to milk every last penny they can get from him because once Mayweather is gone who else is there?
You may now commence with hating on me
In his first fight with Castillo he (Floyd) was out-hustled, he wasn't landing enough shots to steal rounds and the fact that Castillo was the lightweight champion and he was fighting more like the challenger who wanted it more It kind of makes you wonder.
We've seen this happen with other previous fighters who have been hand-fed the same silver spoon treatment Mayweather had and getting the benefit of the doubt AKA Adrien Broner, albeit Broner is not anywhere near the level Mayweather is and Maywether is a genuinely very talented fighter.
Broner has had several fights (Quintero, PDL, Malinaggi) people had him losing but he managed to pull off a decision.
Right that was just the first loss I was talking about the second one comes in at when Mayweather fought Zab Judah...
00:15 seconds into the fight Mayweather gets a nice shot to his nuts and Roger Mayweather steps into the ring and at that point the fight by the rules SHOULD of been a DQ thus resulting in a victory for Zab.
Skip to 10:50
When James Kirkland fought Carlos Molina, Kirkland knocks Molina down in the 10th round and Molinas corner come into the ring and the fight is called off as a DQ and Kirkland is the winner.
What is the difference between that and what Roger did?
Roger did considerably worse as he needed police to take him out of the ring, I think my opinion its a biased agenda to protect Mayweathers 0 as they realized they need this cash cow to milk every last penny they can get from him because once Mayweather is gone who else is there?
You may now commence with hating on me
Comment