Comments Thread For: Schaefer: Khan-Broner - Not Now, Maybe in The Future

[bartolomewj]

Schaefer is so full of it.

The reason Broner won't fight Khan now is Al Haymon doesn't want to specially that Khan may sign with Al. Al still thinks that both Broner and Khan could be rebuilt and would still sell in the very near future.

Although honestly, I think both of them are goners.

[CLUE]

Weight wasnt Broner's problem in his loss, skill was. He's still going to run into trouble at 140. Broner is stuck no matter where he goes at this point.

[bojangles1987]

Yep, of course.

Whoever lost would nearly hit an Ortizian low. Golden Boy doesn't want that.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Yep, of course.

Whoever lost would nearly hit an Ortizian low. Golden Boy doesn't want that.

[Bushbaby]

The loser would become a journeyman gatekeeper. The winner gets no credit cause the loser was a bum.

[Bring It On]

Ok, so Another Bum is not ready for A Mere Con. Gotcha.

[Bronx2245]

I would like to see Khan vs. Guerrero on May 3rd. That would be a respectable win for Khan, against a legit welterweight. If not Guerrero, then fight Alexander, like he should've done in December.

[F!x]

Broner has followed in big bros footsteps and ducked Khan just like Floyd did.

[kavi521]

LOL So Khan want it; Broner wants it; Mayweather wants it but Golden Boy don't.

As a business point, I can see why they would not want the fight to happen. Loser is in the gatekeeper category.

Would be a good fight and build up for the fans.

Do not see this happen any time soon.

[wja1966]

Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo golden Boy then make it a catch weight and that would suit both parties and no excuses.

As a Brit coming to Las Vegas for the Mayweather fight the only Brit on their so far is Olympic Bronze medallist Anthony Ogogo.

I hope their is at least another British fighter and even though I dont particular like or rate Khan it would be good to see him on the bill