Khan: No Brook or Broner, will announce more 'creditable' opponent soon. Who?

[-Kev-]

Wasn't he like on a Broner bashing parade for the last 3 days. Now he's saying he's not credible. Damn I was starting like Khan again but here is talking senseless crap again. I wanted to see Khan vs Broner.

[LacedUp]

Wasn't he like on a Broner bashing parade for the last 3 days. Now he's saying he's not credible. Damn I was starting like Khan again but here is talking senseless crap again. I wanted to see Khan vs Broner.

I think he's called out Broner and got rejected by their team, and then told everyone that they shouldn't listen to them because he's getting a better fight anyway.

He hasn't said broner is not credible.

[Dean_Razorback]

all of those guys give khan problems. he should fight a rematch against malignaggi, or maybe lopez, collazo could be another good option

[shade darkar]

thats a shame, id like to see khan vs brook. fights are always better when the guys really dont like each other. i think khan vs broner would be entertaining. however, whats the point in fighting a guy that just lost to maidana?

[hogey]

Not a fan of Broner, but think he is right to drop down from welterweight because its clearly not the division for him. Not sure why Khan does not stay at L/W and fight him there instead, Khan does not need to move up if he can make big money in a division where he is less likely to get starched by bigger punchers.

[White_Knight]

Imagine if it was Ortiz.

[4Corners]

I think it'll be Guerrero

[Hougigo]

More credible?
Well neither have good credit at 147, but the available list is still short

[fokas]

What exactly are people failing to understand about Porter having a mandatory challenger therefore can't fight Khan? For Khan, my bet is on someone like Guerrero.

[STREET CLEANER]

I say its Guerrero since he has been trying to get out of his contract they might just give him this fight which would be OK in my book.

I hope it is Porter so Brooks can feel embarrased