Could Lomachencko topple SRR as the no 1 ATG?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hhs661
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 6467
    • 409
    • 417
    • 20,927

    #131
    -sigh-

    some posters just can't be taken seriously

    Comment

    • CubanGuyNYC
      Latin From Manhattan
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 15312
      • 1,636
      • 1,621
      • 112,127

      #132
      Originally posted by brickcityboxing
      Yea I mean I think at some point you kind of have to look at it almost as two separate sports ... The game has evolved/changed to hold any modern era fighter to the standards of an SRR would be unfair.
      Yeah, it's like comparing modern baseball players to Babe Ruth. The game was different then. There weren't even black ball players in MLB in those days. The only guys that even approached Ruth's statistics were using steroids. Even Aaron took tons of extra at-bats to break the Babe's home-run record.

      We may never see another professional boxer approach 100 fights, let alone 200. And we'll certainly never see another star fight anything close to 100 bouts. Too much money, and too much awareness of the risks.

      Comment

      • Suckmedry
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 5558
        • 321
        • 201
        • 7,267

        #133
        I am actually baffled by this site. I really didn't think that so many people who know so little about a sport would go to a forum and post about it daily.

        Comment

        • sugarsmosley
          sugarsmosley
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2013
          • 7393
          • 467
          • 436
          • 14,323

          #134
          Originally posted by D4thincarnation
          Seems like a lot of NSB can't understand hypotheticals.
          you have to understand, thats like someone dominating high schoo football and then me claiming they will overthrow jerry rice as the GOAT.

          Comment

          • D4thincarnation
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2011
            • 16198
            • 533
            • 260
            • 133,240

            #135
            Originally posted by sugarsmosley
            you have to understand, thats like someone dominating high schoo football and then me claiming they will overthrow jerry rice as the GOAT.
            You have to understand what hypothetical means. I was not saying Lomachencko would topple SRR, but if he achieved what I stated he would have to achieve, would you consider him greater.

            IMO, yes because of the quality of opponents and the weight classes he would have to go through.

            I stated this several times but like I said far too many on NSB don't know what hypothetical means.

            Comment

            • sugarsmosley
              sugarsmosley
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2013
              • 7393
              • 467
              • 436
              • 14,323

              #136
              Originally posted by D4thincarnation
              You have to understand what hypothetical means. I was not saying Lomachencko would topple SRR, but if he achieved what I stated he would have to achieve, would you consider him greater.

              IMO, yes because of the quality of opponents and the weight classes he would have to go through.

              I stated this several times but like I said far too many on NSB don't know what hypothetical means.
              surely just implying that in itself seems a little far fetched and crazy, dont you think?

              Comment

              • CubanGuyNYC
                Latin From Manhattan
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 15312
                • 1,636
                • 1,621
                • 112,127

                #137
                Originally posted by D4thincarnation
                You have to understand what hypothetical means. I was not saying Lomachencko would topple SRR, but if he achieved what I stated he would have to achieve, would you consider him greater.

                IMO, yes because of the quality of opponents and the weight classes he would have to go through.

                I stated this several times but like I said far too many on NSB don't know what hypothetical means.
                I understand the meaning of the word perfectly. Let me put it into a sentence: "Hypothetically, I could lift a house, if I were a giant ant." It makes absolute sense, but ants the size of human beings do not exist. Why waste time talking about it? We already waste enough time around here talking about all kinds of other nonsense. lol

                Comment

                • D4thincarnation
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 16198
                  • 533
                  • 260
                  • 133,240

                  #138
                  Originally posted by sugarsmosley
                  surely just implying that in itself seems a little far fetched and crazy, dont you think?
                  SRR is seen as untouchable by many as the ATG no 1. It occurred to me that given Lomachencko's title fight in his 2nd fight and the quality around that division and his ambitions of moving up he was capable of trumping SRR record on the quality of fights.

                  I shouldn't really have to spell it out.

                  The argument should be on those lines.

                  Comment

                  • CubanGuyNYC
                    Latin From Manhattan
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 15312
                    • 1,636
                    • 1,621
                    • 112,127

                    #139
                    Originally posted by D4thincarnation
                    SRR is seen as untouchable by many as the ATG no 1. It occurred to me that given Lomachencko's title fight in his 2nd fight and the quality around that division and his ambitions of moving up he was capable of trumping SRR record on the quality of fights.

                    I shouldn't really have to spell it out.

                    The argument should be on those lines.
                    Robinson fought 200 bouts, something Lomo won't come anywhere near. Ray fought in an era where legends abounded. He didn't just beat good fighters; "Sugar" beat several ATGs in a long, storied career. How many awesome fighters are in or near 126 today? Vasyl over Ray? Never.

                    Comment

                    • D4thincarnation
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 16198
                      • 533
                      • 260
                      • 133,240

                      #140
                      Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC
                      Robinson fought 200 bouts, something Lomo won't come anywhere near. Ray fought in an era where legends abounded. He didn't just beat good fighters; "Sugar" beat several ATGs in a long, storied career. How many awesome fighters are in or near 126 today? Vasyl over Ray? Never.
                      So Rigo ain't a ATG.

                      And SRR beat around 20 top fighters.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP