Which of the Sanctioning Bodies is the most Credible?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fighting_Pride
    Pure Aggression
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2012
    • 1779
    • 99
    • 30
    • 8,326

    #1

    Which of the Sanctioning Bodies is the most Credible?

    WBC seems to be the most recognizable. truth is it's the most corrupt. one example, mayweather sucker punched his way to the 147 belt ages ago and he's still listed as their champ.

    WBO on the other hand strip fighters of belt all the time. pacquiao won against bradley, review commision even said so but they still did not reverse the decision.

    WBA has two types of champion, a world champion and a "super" world champion. wtf? arum once said he had to pay them to have his fighters ranked higher.

    IBF champions pretty much earn jack shit. they've been linked with racketeering and bribery.

    it's all for good business i guess.

    your thoughts?
    Last edited by Fighting_Pride; 02-22-2014, 09:26 AM.
  • just the facts
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2014
    • 13791
    • 2,437
    • 1,021
    • 88,113

    #2
    Originally posted by Fighting_Pride
    WBC seems to be the most recognizable. truth is it's the most corrupt. one example, mayweather sucker punched his way to the 147 belt ages ago and he's still listed as their champ.

    WBO on the other hand strip fighters of belt all the time. pacquiao won against bradley, review commision even said so but they still did not reverse the decision.

    WBA has two types of champion, a world champion and a "super" world champion. wtf? arum once said he had to pay them to have his fighters ranked higher.

    IBF champions pretty much earn jack shit. they've been linked with racketeering and bribery.

    it's all for good business i guess.

    your thoughts?
    I find it funny that you're example of the WBCs ineptness fits your agenda.

    Most credible sanctioning body? Kind of a who's the tallest midget arguement

    Comment

    • JFalu
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jan 2014
      • 316
      • 9
      • 0
      • 6,417

      #3
      Originally posted by Fighting_Pride
      WBC seems to be the most recognizable. truth is it's the most corrupt. one example, mayweather sucker punched his way to the 147 belt ages ago and he's still listed as their champ.

      WBO on the other hand strip fighters of belt all the time. pacquiao won against bradley, review commision even said so but they still did not reverse the decision.

      WBA has two types of champion, a world champion and a "super" world champion. wtf? arum once said he had to pay them to have his fighters ranked higher.

      IBF champions pretty much earn jack shit. they've been linked with racketeering and bribery.

      it's all for good business i guess.

      your thoughts?

      There is foolery in all of the sanctioning bodies. As a result, I favor whatever belt looks cooler. WBO and WBC

      Comment

      • Sugar Adam Ali
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2013
        • 27630
        • 970
        • 1,174
        • 82,827

        #4
        None,,,, they are all corrupt and are all horrible,,

        Comment

        • fundicao
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Nov 2011
          • 387
          • 22
          • 0
          • 6,687

          #5
          Wbc
          wba
          ibf
          wbo

          Comment

          • Sugar Adam Ali
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 27630
            • 970
            • 1,174
            • 82,827

            #6
            No way can the WBC seem credible,, arent they the ones that made manny-margs at 150 for a 154 vacant belt, even though manny had never fought at that weight, and margs had lost there and had minimal success vs cab drivers at 154

            Comment

            • #1Assassin
              Conveyor of Truth
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 8019
              • 647
              • 264
              • 20,993

              #7
              i love it how *******s can take any subject, in this case sanctioning bodies and find a way to both bash floyd and praise manny in it. every single post no matter the subject.

              Comment

              • Sugar Adam Ali
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2013
                • 27630
                • 970
                • 1,174
                • 82,827

                #8
                Originally posted by #1Assassin
                i love it how *******s can take any subject, in this case sanctioning bodies and find a way to both bash floyd and praise manny in it. every single post no matter the subject.
                What are you talking about,,, nobody has mentioned floyd at all, and i only used manny-margs as an example of how WBC is corrupt, I could have just as easily used morales-cano as a garbage title fight,, or the floyd-bruscles eliminator.. i wasnt praising manny, i was calling his 8th title a joke

                Comment

                • Ivansmamma
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2004
                  • 4038
                  • 174
                  • 149
                  • 18,547

                  #9
                  Originally posted by JFalu
                  There is foolery in all of the sanctioning bodies. As a result, I favor whatever belt looks cooler. WBO and WBC
                  I agree with this. I like the wbc because its green and ali had that belt.

                  Comment

                  • Sugar Adam Ali
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 27630
                    • 970
                    • 1,174
                    • 82,827

                    #10
                    Originally posted by #1Assassin
                    i love it how *******s can take any subject, in this case sanctioning bodies and find a way to both bash floyd and praise manny in it. every single post no matter the subject.
                    Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
                    What are you talking about,,, nobody has mentioned floyd at all, and i only used manny-margs as an example of how WBC is corrupt, I could have just as easily used morales-cano as a garbage title fight,, or the floyd-bruscles eliminator.. i wasnt praising manny, i was calling his 8th title a joke
                    Correction,, i didnt notice the OP using floyd's sucker punch of ortiz.... Now i know what your talking about

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP